Has anyone watched videos about WTC building 7, claiming it was blown with explosives?

Question

I just saw it yesterday and it is so hard to comprehend something like this. To those that have seen the arguments which side do you fall on?

Answer 1

Yes. From the north side, it doesnt look like it should have collapsed. But most of those videos only show the north side. The south side (facing wtc1&2) had extensive damage. Before it collapsed, the southwest part was bulging..
thats when firemen started telling people to get away because they knew it was going collapse.

The biggest problem with the controlled demolition theory is that it takes weeks/months to get a building ready for demolition. They have to cut a lot of the supports for the explosives to bring the building down. People would have noticed workers cutting the supports.

Answer 2

After watching the videos of it falling to the ground, I would be more likely to believe that it was a controlled demolition than it just falling down because debris damaged one corner of the building. If it fell because of the debris, then it would have fell in on the corner that had the damage first instead of the whole building falling i at the same time.

I also saw news footage from a British company stating that building 7 had collapsed to the ground, but in the background of the shot you could see that building 7 was still standing with smoke coming out of it.

Answer 3

I think simple-minded people have a tendency to believe complex explanations that contradict obvious facts, whereas more intelligent people are more likely to accept that sometimes things are, indeed, as they appear. The problem is that the simple-minded often think themselves more intelligent than they actually are, since their ability to penetrate the nefarious schemes proves that they are far cleverer than the fools who are easily duped by the obvious truth.

Answer 4

i had watched...has some truth in it* on the falling of debris )...i am also not sure which is true as i havent been there