if one man's food is another's poison?
2007-11-02 01:57:26 · 10 answers · asked by εϊзSmart Cookieεϊз 4 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
What this means is that there really is no such thing as good or bad and that they're both just perspectives. What is considered good or bad is merely a point of view. A Republican may consider abortion and homosexuality "bad" or even "evil," while a Democrat may consider both "good." Some people consider the Iraq war "good" while others consider it "bad." Its all a matter of perspective. Remember Shakespeare's quote "Nothing is either good or bad, but thinking makes it so?" Well he was spot on.
2007-11-02 02:06:08 · answer #1 · answered by abdiver12 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The difference between good and bad is that when you think
you have two voices: you conscience and an evil voice
known as the human flesh desires and you're in a constant
battle especially for men you know the right thing but the
voices can also change your mind.
2007-11-02 02:08:58 · answer #2 · answered by Jr. m 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Good and bad are what is most beneficial and most detrimental, respectively, to us as individuals depending on the circumstances involved. There are few universals. It's mostly a matter of perspective and personal preference.
2007-11-02 02:07:09 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Anything that is destructive or whose end result is destruction is bad.
Usually it takes only an idiot one second to destroy or do something bad.
Anything that is constructive or whose end result is construction is good.
Usually it takes the co-operation of many skilled and intelligent people, a lot of time and patience, to construct or do something good.
It takes many technicians, masons, engineers, a lot of money, and many years of hard work to make a big building or house or aeroplane.
But it takes only one second for a stupid idiot to light a match and start a fire to destroy many buildings and forests.
2007-11-02 05:28:36 · answer #4 · answered by Tony F 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The arbitrary judgement of the witnesses.
No more.
I personally think that killing humans is perfectly justifiable. Most others would disagree with me... Big whoop. The only reason I don't kill people is the social backlash and inevitable prison sentence that would befall me as a result of public opinion.
2007-11-02 02:03:24 · answer #5 · answered by Lucid Interrogator 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
good is the side that tries to help other's in need, be positive, and be content with what they have. bad is the side that constantly wants attention, fame, and does horrribel things to get it. bad isn't very modest either.
2007-11-02 02:05:51 · answer #6 · answered by Silver Phoenix 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
sounds like a riddle to me. anyway, you need to distinguish what the good or bad is for example: behavior, or would it be smell you know elaborate.
2007-11-02 02:10:08 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
good lifts you up, and the ppl in your world.
bad brings sadness, hurt, and collateral damage, that is innocents hurt by others' actions.
2007-11-02 04:14:15 · answer #8 · answered by pansyblue 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the line of which would benefit one from the other.
the limits of which consequence would step in
the boundaries of reasoning.
the flesh and the skin....
in other words, how one conceives the pursuit of truth beyond lies.
ciao....
2007-11-02 02:03:59 · answer #9 · answered by VeRDuGo 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Opposites are complimentary!
2007-11-02 02:11:16 · answer #10 · answered by Premaholic 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋