Aha, the wicked media is once again trying to force their will onto the masses.
2007-11-02 03:06:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by The Voice of Reason 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
I don't trust Bush,no credibility very sneaky.
But you cant tell by what the media says, they just make everything sound exciting that is their job, that keep them in business. I am sorry for you all if you believe everything they say.
And if you want my opinion, Bush endorsed her thinking it would loose her democrat votes.
Because they would think that she had turned republican.
I wish she would win and get Eward's for vice president, I think he is a good candidate.
I would like to see a lady in the white house.
And see Bill in there, but we couldn't call him first lady.I guess we could call him first man.
I am sure some of you could think of a different name.
And who ever win this election, They need all the help they can get, I haven't seen this world in as bad of a condition as it in now. It would take a genius to get it back on tract.
Our country is in deep ---- I wouldn't want to try as president now.
With our budget in the shape its in, it will take 10 to 15 years to See light.
Queen Bee
2007-11-02 17:08:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
The media is losing viewers because of their continuous lying. Or rather half truths. That and the fact that ppl are working more now to just to make ends meet because of the hidden out of control inflation being passed off into the price of goods. Then not to mention small business owners having to contend with the ongoing threat of commercial espionage being commited against them and wondering why their profits have decreased by over 40 to 60% in the past 22 months. Is it politically related? That will be known here soon enough. You are are most certainly correct however, she is not the choice. She is in fact the incurable cancer that will kill whats left of our little known 9actual real government design)"A constitutional representative republic.". Are ppl that apathetic, complacent, and misguided that they are willing to really give up their "freedoms" for socialism? If she gets elected i believe that question will be answered. I for one will vote for "true freedom and independence", and that choice is Ron Paul. Sometimes to be able to move ahead we must first return back to the foundation upon which this mess was raised upon. Remember foundations are made to be permanent structures, anything built upon them can be torn down and rebuilt. However to remove the foundation and expect the structure that was built upon it to remain standing is a completely stupid notion. It would be destined to collapse for sure. Restore the republic. It is going to take nothing short of the "will of the people" to reset the system, hopefully having learned from our past mistakes to build something where "true freedom anjd Independence", prosperity, and the pursuit of ones dreams and goals are not hindered by certain groups or individuals thinking they have control of the will of the people. Quit being misled(Quit believing everything you hear and only half of what you see) Make what we were given in 1787 work for us now. And keep it this time.
Ron Paul 2008.
2007-11-01 21:50:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Greetings. still the pulling the wool over our eyes. or the magicians trick of misdirection to distract us so we don't see what the magician does. Hillary is a non-entity as far as being a leader goes. she is simply a opportunistic player that sucks up to anyone she thinks will benefit her, regardless of if it is for the good of the country or not. she could not care less about the country anyway. Remember that bush and homies did not put into law the patriot law saying that in the event of a national emergency that bush and his cohort Cheney could declare a emergency and make themselves the entire government. dissolving the useless drones in congress, the senate and the supreme court. only dictator bush and his handler, Cheney. Declare martial law and move in the mercenaries that they are training in Iraq now to control the people here and protect the new government. Too bad that we are armed here and refuse to be disarmed by traitors no matter what office they may hold. may be that their backing of the decoy, Hillary, is just that. get us to watch Hillary lie her way around the country and not watch what the chimp and his compatriots are up to.
2007-11-01 20:10:24
·
answer #4
·
answered by Rich M 3
·
2⤊
3⤋
I have never voted, why? Cause look at all the loosers running for office, they're all pretty much the same. I think Clinton was a good pres. at the time and Kennedy would have been a good one too. I think we need an independant person for once.
2007-11-03 02:25:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by freekin 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Oh yes, we can DEFINITELY agree on that. It seems the media is trying to show the clueless that any vote they cast that doesn't have Hillary's name on it is wasted. It's crazy how much they're pushing her and trying to sway everyone into believing she's the front runner.
I also think Guliani is running for the wrong party, and most of the Republicans I talk to are like ... uh, WHY is he the front runner? He's a RINO. I'm also starting to believe he's an implant to insure a democratic victory, as a lot of people are threatening to go third party if he's nominated.
2007-11-01 18:56:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by Karma 4
·
6⤊
4⤋
I am really disturbed at the polls that show her supposedly dominating over the rest of the candidates. (Democratic and Republican.) I know very few people, from the left or the right, that want to vote for her.
Are they seriously legit? I mean usually one can trust the polls, but I just don't know...
2007-11-01 19:09:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by Liberals love America! 6
·
4⤊
1⤋
I agree with you. The media is selling her as "Americas Choice" by giving her so much air time. It seems to happen over and over again. They want someone who everyone has strong feelings about.
I can't support Hillary Clinton. I find it amusing how excited the right gets whenever her name is mentioned. She is a Republican in everything but name.
2007-11-01 18:59:16
·
answer #8
·
answered by Zardoz 7
·
4⤊
4⤋
registered independant but liberal at heart...and i too am not for Hilldog. For the reason that she doesn't walk her talk. And Bush Clinton Clinton Bush Bush Clinton is a horrible idea in and of itself. I'm still all for Gravel even though his campaign has like $3. If she wins the primary I might vote republican
2007-11-01 19:00:01
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
3⤋
I've been kind of assuming the Republican machine was trying to set her up to win the Primary, since she's the only candidate they could beat in a General Election. Why else would radioactive President Bush endorse her, but not support any of the Republicans?
2007-11-01 18:56:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by Beardog 7
·
3⤊
5⤋