English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

"History teaches that underestimating the words of evil, ambitious men is a terrible mistake," Bush said. "In the early 1900s, the world ignored the words of Lenin, as he laid out his plans to launch a Communist revolution in Russia — and the world paid a terrible price.

“In the 1920s, the world ignored the words of Hitler, as he explained his intention to build an Aryan super-state in Germany, take revenge on Europe, and eradicate the Jews — and the world paid a terrible price," Bush continued. "Bin Laden and his terrorist allies have made their intentions as clear as Lenin and Hitler before them. And the question is: Will we listen?"
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/

honestly i am no fan of hillary. But for Bush to make some analogy to Hillary- Lenon - Hitler is absurd.

every time I hear Bush talk- it is PROJECTION. Apparently the bushcons are not too bright. they fall for it every time...anyting. Anything he says, HE IS HE ONE HE IS TALKING ABOUT! hahaa

2007-11-01 18:41:53 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

6 answers

Bush is a complete idiot. This just furthur validates it. Even Republicans hope he goes back to his texas ranch and never show up in politics again. He is no conservative and he is not a moderate Republican. What else can he be other than a complete moron?

All the candidates on Republican side are a pathetic bunch. None of them has a solid path forward for Iraq. I had hope that I will be able to bring myself to support McCain or Romney, but McCain's plan for Iraq is stupid, and Romney does not have squad. Guliani has even less. A few months of handling the immediate aftermath of 9/11 at New York does not make you an expert on terrorism. Refusing Arabian states' monety is gutsy moves, but it does not help get help on the terrorism war via diplomacy.

Also, ex_righty. Did I detect your slight willingness to vote for Hillary? lol. At least we are getting another Bill Clinton (minus the sex scandal, at least we hope, and the charm). Hillary is not the best possible candidate for the presidency of 2008, but I simply don't see anyone better, who is viable to be elected and govern effectively without any learning on the job nonsense. We simply can not have any missteps after Bush presidency.

Bush has been making wrong moves since he first stepped into the oval office, and he is still doing everything wrong. I had hoped that Bush will not be the worst president of US history. I wanted to keep that title for Herbert Hoover, who presided over Great Depression before FDR took over. Hoover did not believe it is the government duty to care for those suffering from depression and chose to do nothing. We all know how well that turned out.

Instead of doing nothing and let things take the worse turns, Bush is actually agressively making everything worse. He has broken the military resources. All the military equipments are being worn down. Our current pace of defense spending has to continue for the next 10 years even if Iraq war II concludes today. I am not even sure if it's possible to replenish all the equipments within 10 years at the current pace of spending. Walter Reed fiasco only furthur shows the military's ill preparations to support those who gave their lives and their well beings to preserve the safety of this country.

All of these come on top of the nation facing its latest babyboomer generation retiring and draining vast resources out of Social Security and other retirement funds. To keep the listing going, Bush has not shown clear leadership in keeping the economy going other than age-old Repulican slogan of "No New Taxes". Quite frankly with middle class shrinking and being squeezed, I have no problems to make rich people pay much more taxes. Wasting millions like it's nothing? What luxury! If the rich complains, the middle class who support those rich should quit working for the rich and see how they like it.

Sorry to ramble, but people just don't know how crucial this election is. Other than Hilary who has the experiences, the resources within the government, and general good impressions to the rest of the world, I really don't see any alternatives. President Hillary is going to be very dull, and completely not what I imagine for a female US president. Again, in comparisons to other 2-bits candidates out there, there are no one who is more qualified and has more clouts to make sure stuff gets done.

Well, that's it for now. A lot of stuff to chew on with this answer.


XR

2007-11-01 19:28:02 · answer #1 · answered by XReader 5 · 1 0

that's often the in charge screaming the loudest approximately any given subject. the only screaming "racist" the loudest is often the racist.....the only screaming with regard to the type you could desire to tighten your belt is the guy who needs tightening the main. The extra you alter....the fewer they could desire to. in spite of everything.....would not the international be a lots nicer place if it became run your way? If all of us replaced and did what you needed.....it can be a impressive international. No issues........ A thief is conscious a thank you to catch a thief......a lier can spot one a mile away.....a sword has 2 edges and cuts the two techniques. subject is....human beings are not as stupid anymore and now they're attempting an rather rudimentary game of opposite psychology.

2016-12-15 13:49:12 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Greetings. I don't believe that Bush is anything like Adolf Hitler. Hitler was a genius, Bush is a retarded idiot born with a silver spoon up his behind. Although Bush does follow in the foot steps of Hitler, like the amazing similarity of our 9/11 to the Reichstag fire that got Hitler and the Nazi party into dictatorial power. the dissolution of the German senate and the republican control of our senate and congress, including the so called opposition party, the democrats in it. The constant propaganda and bullshit about national security and how we have to give up our rights to be secure so he can send us to concentration camps for our own good. Bush would love to be compared to Hitler. but he is not in the same league, no matter how much he tries to copy the Nazis he is still simply trailer trash with money. Hitler paid his dues. Bush was handed everything on a golden platter. And one must recall that propaganda is aimed at the weak minded of the people. so anyone who spouts republican propaganda gives away their real IQ of near a 10 year old child. Good luck in your campaign to try to get Americans to do something that they are not very well equipped for, thinking.

2007-11-01 20:21:55 · answer #3 · answered by Rich M 3 · 1 0

Seriously, did you even read the article you linked?

Bush was talking about Osama Bin Laden and his cohorts, who have, in fact, stated just what they intended to do, and then went and did it.

It takes a special kind of moron to read that article and then draw the conclusion that Bush is Hitler and that he's projecting that onto Hillary.

No wonder your Q&As are private. Three of the dumbest questions I've read..EVER..on Yahoo!Answers were posted tonight by the same person. You.

2007-11-01 19:19:43 · answer #4 · answered by A Balrog of Morgoth 4 · 0 1

IN my book Hillery is a fine lady, and she does have common sense, alone with a great education.
What are we looking for in a president any way. You cant please everyone, and a friend is better than a enemy. And I wish everyone would stop running down Bill he did a good job running this country. We would be better off to make friends with other countries,as to have them as enemy's.
Queen Bee

2007-11-02 11:01:27 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

"either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists"
absolutism at it's best.

2007-11-01 18:47:31 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers