I don't believe we are ever going to stop killing, and every year there seem to be countless numbers of wars being started. We only care for your own kind, I mean neither human race nor people from our own land...but only those who are connected by blood.... We exploit the earth and take everything...but ever the ones to give.... The basic law of life in this planet for so long has been "The organisms adapt to its surroundings" but we have changed that "We change the surroundings so that it would adapt to use..", we also plan to do that to other planets in the near future..
Anyway,
Nature also could be a part of this genocide, as it creates thousands of new viruses every day trying to hack into the human immune system...
The more you look around, the more you know that this place isn't for us.....
So......how long do we have??
2007-11-01 18:05:54 · 16 answers · asked by Live for the System! 3 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
lol you've been listening to too much system of a down.
2007-11-01 18:08:09 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Live for the system. You damn near got it right there!
We will bring ourselves to genocide at Armageddon but by God's grace we will be stopped.
The very act of a unified race coming together for one final and great battle of a war to kill ourselves off is genocide self made by mankind. That is what is going to bring God to our senses. He will stop us and then take over, letting us know in the transaction that we cannot live without Him and we will have proved Him right by our own actions. A self propelled genocide!!
If genocide as an answer hit you now then perhaps you should look into the prophecies. The next thing that could hit you could be the truth. That is one hell of a life saving slap!!
But it's a good one.
2007-11-01 22:44:46 · answer #2 · answered by the old dog 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I was asked a similar question in a Philosophy class in college...
"What would be the most effective way to end most of mans' current problems?"
I wrote that the most effective way to end most of mans' current problems would be to reduce the human population to 1/1000th. of it's current size. This would leave around 6 million humans, so extinction from a reduced gene pool would not be an issue.
The reduction of population would do the following;
1: End wars caused by a shortage of land
2: Reduce the energy demands to a point where supply would equal or exceed demand.
3: Reduce the amount of food required, eliminating hunger and starvation
4: Reduce the enviromental damage caused by man due to over foresting, and pollution. Because with less people there would be less impact on the enviroment. This could allow areas to return to nature, and even halt the extinction of many vital species.
5: Most wars are based upon resources, one country has something the other needs. Whether that be gold, oil, trees, or even just water. By reducing the need for those resources, wars wouldn't be necessary because there would be plenty to go around for everyone.
My answer went on in greater detail, but you get the general idea.
I'm not saying that we SHOULD do this, just that it would be the best thing for man if it did happen.
I got an "A", so the professor must have understood.
2007-11-01 18:30:09 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
I don't know what you've been looking at, but when your meds kick in, let us know.
You entire statement can be summed up in one word. FEAR.
Fear is your worst enemy it seems to me. In all of your discussion, you never bothered to point out any of the good things that have come about in human history.
Even more to the point, throughout history, people have had this same fear-based mania about world events That also hasn't changed.
To suggest that Genocide is the answer is completely ludicrous.
The more I look around, the more I realize that this place isn't for people like you. People who don't have the courage to stand up and fight for a better world. People that cower and hide behind cliches and prophecies of the end of the world.
If half of you would spend as much time working to change things instead of 'crying wolf' at the human race, we would have alot more help in changing the world for the better.
2007-11-01 18:35:25 · answer #4 · answered by Gee Whizdom™ 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I'm gonna have to stop ya'...
It's who I am...
It's where I'm at...
It's what I do...
Every now and then I am called upon to save the world from all evil...and I do it very well...as you can tell from the marvelous state of our planet right now...
But even though things "look" bad right now if you only focus on the "bad...
Life is still good, my friend...the death of everyone takes place individually every 100 years or so spread out over a period of time equally that amount...where are all the people who lived 150 years ago?!?
They're all dead...
So quitcha' whining...you got 80 years tops from this moment on before YOU are dead...no need to "rush" everyone else's death for some misbegotten, egg-headed concept that's been stirring around in your angry brain...
Live and let live...enjoy life while you can...and stop thinking in the "big picture" all the time...the "little pictures (us) are very important, too...
Now...reject this foolish idea immediately...
Or Damn Laid Back will be forced to thwart your evil plans to destroy the world...
James Bond is on Sabbatical at the moment...and...
I'm his reluctant stand-in...but I can assure you...I'll get the babes AND the job done in tip-top fashion...
You have been warned, Dr. Evil...
Don't mess...with a Texan...
2007-11-01 18:30:44 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
This is an easy one. If the world gets too hot, we've proven that we can survive it because the "Cradles of Civilization" were in hot, dry areas. If the world gets cold, then we've already proven that we can withstand ice ages, and that's without any "high" technology. If the world gets overpopulated, it will, out of necessity, balance itself out. I don't think we need to worry about surviving the next 100 years. The real question is how to we keep the next 100 years from becoming the next Dark Age.
2016-04-01 23:58:03 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It has been suggested by some scientists. The link below is from an article I read a few months ago. Here is a quote:
"...Texas Academy of Science rose to their feet and gave a standing ovation to a speech that enthusiastically advocated the elimination of 90 percent of Earth's population by airborne Ebola..."
SHUDDER!!!
2007-11-01 18:10:43 · answer #7 · answered by johnny_100pesos 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No long.The Virgin Mary said "God is displeased with what has been going on in our world,his patience is nearly exhausted.
Our Lord is displeased and that men of all races must mend their ways Pray-pray and pray from the heart.Do penance for our sins,meditate,fast,read Sacred Scriptures,always thank God ,confess,fast from the heart giving gratitude to God.When God comes he will not be joking"!
2007-11-01 23:28:04 · answer #8 · answered by ROBERT P 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Genocide would definitely be good for the earth in general.
It wouldn't be that great if you were a human though.
2007-11-01 20:55:01 · answer #9 · answered by Tuna-San 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The clock is ticking. But how about a slightly more civilized solution - mandatory birth control? Beats genocide or mass-euthenasia.
2007-11-01 18:10:54 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
natural genocide is gonna happen sooner of later. If a virus like marburg or ebola enter mainstream society we are f*cked
2007-11-01 18:08:59 · answer #11 · answered by a person 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋