If Sadam Hussain was still in power over in Iraq?
2007-11-01 17:08:49 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
He fought Al Quaeda well and would have died soon.
As priorly mentioned here, straight Afghanistan action
and building up without phantom aid solely for the pockets
of Hallib... Che Dickney, would have saved money, could
have saved hundreds of thousands lives - who really knows,
the only countries who did not warn us about a coming 9/11
were Saudi Arabia & Pakistan, we got uhm interesting allies.
2007-11-01 17:30:17 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
Yes. because that means we would not be there, and they would not be on the verge of civil war. We would have more troops for Afghanistan, and 3000 American soldiers would not be dead and 30,000 would not be wounded and the our national debt would be almost a trillion dollars less. We might even be in position to do something about the REAL nuclear threat that Iran poses.
2007-11-02 00:31:09 · answer #2 · answered by meg 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Probably - especially if we Marshall-planned Afgahnistan.
2007-11-02 00:23:34 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 1⤋
Only if we sent all of the liberals over there and told him that they were going to overthrow him...THEN America would be better off.
They say that there is no such thing as a bad question...I guess you just shot that theory out the window.
Conan...just because Donald Trump has business sense, you think that he knows anything about foreign policy. To name a couple of REALLY stupid things he said in that interview. 1. That Bush is probably the worst president ever....CARTER was the worst ever. 2. That we need to make deals with these people. Spoken like the Donald...everybody wants to make a deal. YOU DO NOT DEAL WITH TERRORISTS! 3. Declare victory and leave. Uh...though US deaths have decreased for 5 straight months, victory is not ours YET! 4. 400,000 deaths "the way I count it" (his words) This is the highest estimate yet. Financial intelligence does not necessarily give you foreign policy intelligence. In Trump's case...it obviously doesn't.
Sam...You think Saddam FOUGHT Al Qaeda? Saddam had Al Qaeda training camps in Iraq. WTF are you smoking?
2007-11-02 00:12:34 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 9⤋
Here is what the people with some brains say ;)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a30rJQbDDno
2007-11-02 00:28:29 · answer #5 · answered by Conan 4 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Noooo! Ask the people of Iraq! They are grateful he is gone.
2007-11-02 00:23:15 · answer #6 · answered by Miss Kitty 6 · 3⤊ 7⤋
No. That's like asking if we would be better off if Hitler, Satan, or a Clinton were in power.
2007-11-02 00:16:32 · answer #7 · answered by C C 3 · 5⤊ 6⤋
I believe there would be less Iraqis than there are now. Given his rate of murders.
2007-11-02 00:12:46 · answer #8 · answered by rance42 5 · 5⤊ 6⤋
No and neither would they.
Damn I get PO ed every time this comes up.
The man had 500 tons of yellow cake uranium and centrifuges. what do you think he was going to do with this stuff,
2007-11-02 00:15:22 · answer #9 · answered by CFB 5 · 5⤊ 9⤋
good question. not sure, but i know there would be a lot less dead people.
2007-11-02 00:13:11 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 8⤊ 6⤋