SAUDI ARABIA KNEW ABOUT 9-11 before it happened?

Question

Prince Bandar knew, was onto the Saudi terroists!!!! "If U.S. security authorities had engaged their Saudi counterparts in a serious and credible manner, in my opinion, we would have avoided what happened," he said. http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/meast/11/01/saudiarabia.terrorism/index.html


Now we can see the continuity between what Condi RIce admitted then denied

http://www.911blogger.com/files/video/CondiRice911.mov

we now see an "outside" confirmation of prior knowledge to 911. something the bush gang had said then denied.

WOW! D.C. amazing. so exactly wy was he imprisoned? and why was he released? just routine encarceration?

god you guys believe anything.

Answer 1

SOME THING YOU MIGHT NOT KNOW , SAUDI'S HAD BIN LADEN IN JAIL THERE AND OFFERED TO HAND HIM OVER TO BILL CLINTON . SLICK WILLY REFUSED EVEN THOU IT WAS KNOWEN AT THAT TIME BIN LADEN WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FIRST BOMBING OF THE PARKING GARAGE AT THE WORLD TRADE CENTER . IF BILL CLINTON ( SLICK WILLY ) HAD DONE HIS JOB AND TAKEN BIN LADEN , INSTEAD OF MONICA L . THERE NEVER WOULD HAVE BEEN A 9 / 11

Answer 2

So when were the Saudis "following the hijackers with precision". Perhaps around the time President Clinton was warned about the 9-11 attack in 96 and then proceeded to do nothing. And according to the story, the
Saudis didn't know the nature of the attack, they could warn us that something was going to happen, but not what was happening.We knew that, we got about 200 warnings and Israel had put out a warning to its installations around the world. And this story admits that this is an OPINION, not a fact. Nothing in there says that Bush was aware of what was going to happen or when.

Answer 3

Greetings. Note that there was never any proof that the Moslem's had anything to do with the 9-11 attack on the world trade centers. note that no one was tried for the incident and some of the people that the government claimed were among the hijackers have been found alive and well. FBI claimed that there was no evidence that it was even passenger planes that rammed the trade center buildings. no black box. no wings and tail section lying on the ground. no engines. no bodies of passengers. names of the supposed passengers never released. no mention at all of where all the people were who would normally have been at work in the towers, maybe all 40,000 of them were late that day? it was simply a set up. staged well enough for someone who is not familiar with explosives or even with basic physics to be fooled. remember that propaganda is made to be used on children's minds. usually aimed at the level of a 10 year old. and to a ten year old reality is a pretty slippery thing. Ever look at a newspaper photo of a passenger plane crash? lots of rubble surrounds the crash site. lots of plane parts torn off and scattered. none at the world trade centers nor at the pentagon. and none at the site of the plane that went down in Pennsylvania either. Strange. but then people will believe anything, especially if there is no reason to at all.

Answer 4

The terrorists have been Saudi voters, yet they have been knowledgeable in Al-Qaeda camps in Afghanistan. we predict of it fairly is far fetched that human beings knowledgeable in a third international united states could pull off the 9/11 assaults, and that has introduced approximately many conspiracy theories. undergo in recommendations, nevertheless, that the camps in Afghanistan have been funded by using wealthy persons and charities from Saudi Arabia and different Gulf countries, meaning the camps had get right of entry to to knowledgeable, experienced specialists and supplies that rivaled the yankee and ecu intelligence agencies. It wasn't the Saudi or US government that knowledgeable the 9/11 terrorists, besides the reality that the two countries did openly fund and prepare the communities that preceded Al-Qaeda to combat the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in the Eighties. The terrorists did study to fly in the U. S., yet that wasn't below the watch of CIA brokers, as conspiracy theorists say. in reality, their attending flight college in the U. S. is information that the CIA wasn't in touch by way of fact in the event that they have been does no longer it have got here approximately to them to disguise the flight instruction in yet another united states? And those conspiracy theorists will say that the government is a wasteful, bloated, incompetent forms while it fits their argument, or that it fairly is administered by using resourceful evil masterminds while that fits their argument. additionally, Iraq had no longer something to do with 9/11, yet Saddam replaced into like Al-Qaeda in that he replaced into an enemy that we created 2 an prolonged time in the previous to comprise yet another certainly one of our enemies, Iran. And the Iranians have been our enemies on account that they had a revolution against yet another dictator we had created years in the previous to replace their first constitutional, democratic government. the classes of 9/11 and Iraq are that our agencies are companies to severe incompetence and that our congress needs to renounce granting militia or economic help to any foreign places entity for any reason.

Answer 5

I just think it is very interesting how the buildings pancaked so perfectly, just like a detonation rigged building. Hmmmm......
Isn't that interesting?How's about Rduy moved his offices right before it happened? How about the security team for those buildings was owned by the Bush's...Food for thought.

Answer 6

HERE'S A BETTER ONE IN 96 IT WAS PUBLICLY DISAVOWED BY FRIENDS THAT ONE SHOULD STAY OUT OF TALL BUILDINGS. I WON'T DIVULGE THEIR NATIONALITY BUT THEY WERE NOT FROM MEXICO. TRY THIS ONE ON FOR SIZE. THE 93 BOMBING CAUSED STRUCTURAL BEAM DAMAGE TO THE WTC AND AS SUCH ITS HEIGHT AND SUBJECTIVITY TO LIGHTNING STRIKES CAUSED EXPENSIVE OR UNFIXABLE DAMAGE. PERHAPS YOU SAW THE REPORT ON HOW AN ENGLISH HELICOPTER WAS SUSPECTED OF HAVING HELICOPTER BLADES WITH POOR METALLURGY DUE TO SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT. IT WAS LATER REPORTED THE DOWNING OF THE HELICOPTER AND STRESS DAMAGE TO THE BLADE COULD OF RESULTED FROM A LIGHTNING STRIKE. IF A RELATIVELY STATIONARY BUILDING, SUBJECT TO REPEATED AND COUNTLESS LIGHTNING STRIKES, INCURS DAMAGE THAT PREMISES IT UNSTABLE WOULDN'T IT BE BETTER FOR IT TO COLLAPSE AFTER AN ALLOWED TERRORIST ATTACK. WOULN'T THE INSURERS CAPITATILIZE FROM THEIR INVESTMENT, WOULDN'T THE ISRAELI LOBBY BENEFIT FROM THE RENEWED INTEREST IN THE ISRAELI, SYRIAN, IRAQ/IRAN ROADMAP. I FEEL THAT THE LATTER IS EVIDENT REASON ENOUGH TO SUBSTANTIATE THE REASONS FOR A 'TERRORIST' ATTACK. REMEMBER THEY STRUCK AND THEY EXPECTED RETALIATION, WHETHER IN IRAQ OR AFGHANISTAN. I AM SURE THAT JUST LIKE THEY KNEW AHEAD OF TIME ABOUT 911 THEY ALSO HAD INSIDE KNOWLEDGE ABOUT THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION FOCUSING ON IRAQ, DUE TO ITS RICH OIL SUPPLY. IRAN HAS PLENTY OF NATURAL GAS AND PRIOR TO INVADING IRAQ THE USA SUPPORTED THE TALIBAN IN INITIATING A NATURAL GASLINE WITHIN AFGHANISTAN AND ONLY TIME WILL TELL HOW IT IS UTILIZED AS THE BEGINNINGS OF THE US/IRAN WAR HAVE BEEN ACTUALIZED. NO WONDER THEY DON'T WANT IRAN TO BE SELF SUFFICIENT, NUCLEAR, AS THE USA COULD EXPORT NATURAL GAS, IMPORT OIL AND AS MATT DAMON PUT IT IN SYRIANA LEAVE THEM DEVOID OF ANY CIVILIZATION WHILE THEY HUMP HEROIN ON THE BACKS OF CAMELS.

Answer 7

i think they did!
oh and also if you look it up
wen bill clinton was president terrorists
also tried to bomb the towers they did but the
towers were barely damaged and no one did nothing
about it! then 9/11 happened

Answer 8

You've got nice horns.

Answer 9

i farted