Now that we've had time to view both party debates it seems to me that both parties have candidates that seem a little looney. In your opinion who in each party is that loon?
2007-11-01 16:34:28 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Balrog: Going to be a long boring two years.
2007-11-01 16:54:00 · update #1
I'm looking more for the ones that say and do the dumbest things.
2007-11-01 16:56:22 · update #2
looney list:
Gravel: He thinks he's in a chat room.
Biden: He's convinced he can kick everyone's a s s so therefore should be the president.
Kucinich: I used to say that the mother ship will be along to pick him up shortly. To my amazement, he agrees.
Clinton: I wish she was a loon but, she's serious. That's worse.
Paul: Like letting an over inflated baloon lose and watching it fly around the room bouncing off the chandelier. Harmless but, it still makes you duck.
2007-11-01 23:49:37 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The entire GOP line up of presidential candidates are a bunch of loons with the exception of Ron Paul. The only loon in the Democratic field is Mike Gravel.
2007-11-01 16:38:38 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
seem, I dont care if no one receives contained in the oval workplace. The presidents from bill clintons time were rebuked with the actual undeniable actuality that the U.S. and the midsection jap international places were in a nuclear weapon posession conflict and they declared a draw. because of this, Arabian international places are preserving oil or stressful more advantageous for complicated paintings, which stops our expenditures from slowing down. Now Obama and Mccain are capitalizing in this problem and are for this reason getting votes. This brings up the actual undeniable actuality that the applicants are declaring what we pick them to assert, yet aren't to any extent further really providing data of a stick with by. We cant appreciate them till achievable data is obtained, and besides I say forget em cuz Im vote casting G.
2016-10-23 06:14:59 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You have a valid point ! It would be refreshing to see any candidate be able to answer " yes " or " no " questions with " yes " or " no " answers !! They should understand that the American voters are wise to the "election lingo " such as using phrases` like ; " the fact of the matter is " , " that is not what I said , I was misquoted " , " My statement was taken out of context " and last but not least , " my plan , well it will be free " !! This is a sad time for our great nation as we have lost our way morally ! We as citizens , no matter what party affiliation have allowed our values to be slowly drained from the mainstream train of thought ! We can say ACLU , but we can`t say Jesus or Christmas ? Unbelievable !!
2007-11-01 18:29:08 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Well, John McCain (R) does due to his supporting Hispanic illegals coming into America during his whole time as a Senator, in Arizona. He is using the illegals, and going against 96% of actual Americans, in hope for illegal Hispanic's future vote. He wants to keep his seat in the Senate, so has always supported illegal trespassing, by Hispanic's, due to the ammount who live in Arizona, VERY near the Mex/American border lines. This tells me he is more interested in political power, and safety for himself, rather than the American people, and their desires. I am so sorry, as well, that this is the truth. He is a Vietnam war hero, and for that, also has my deepest respect. However, he lost most of it due to the reasons mentioned above.
I don't however, have a worry that he will win in the primary. Democrat, and Republican alike, know what he has done about illegal trespassing, for the most part.
I feel Mitt Romney will be the winner of the Republican primaries, and he will get my vote. I wanted Duncan Hunter (CA), but he is not known enough throughout USA, yet, so probably doesn't have a real chance at winning the primary. At least a lot of his supporter's feel that way. Yeah, Republicans can talk too, we just don't scream BS, like the Libs!
2007-11-01 16:54:59 · answer #5 · answered by xenypoo 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Well Kucinich is way out there with the UFOs now so I think he wins, hands down even if I think he's bringing some solid policy proposals. Of all the socialized medicine, his actually sounds like it would be best for the tax payers and patients. Not that I support that kind of fantasy ... UFOs and functional socialized medicine! Hah!
Ron Paul is completely out of his mind to think that the constitution is any way to run a world empire.
Gravel is nuts to think he can talk *&@# about NBC/GE/MSNBC's corporate welfare and get on TV rated higher than CSPAN3 ever again.
Of course, Hillary is the king of making me stop and scratch my head. I think: "Wow, she's evil, but she lies so well... maybe she's the best one for the job..." It is politics, after all.
2007-11-01 18:12:18 · answer #6 · answered by freedom first 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Mike Gravel. Mitt "Shape Shifting" Romney, Hillary "If I knew then" Clinton, and Rudy "9/11- fill in the blank" Giuliani.
2007-11-01 16:38:51 · answer #7 · answered by Chi Guy 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Scratch my head and upchuck on the whole mess. Their has to be Americans out their who are smart and care about the people of this country ? Or are we getting what we've been paying for in our own lack in caring for as to what is happening to this country until it to late ?
2007-11-01 16:47:44 · answer #8 · answered by Mogollon Dude 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm sorry, but what's the fun of a two year election campaign without a few clowns to liven things up?
2007-11-01 16:52:59 · answer #9 · answered by A Balrog of Morgoth 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes. All the Democrats and almost all the Republicans are on my "Do I trust these guys as far as I can throw them" watch list. I sure wish there were more choices on both sides of the fence.
2007-11-01 16:42:19 · answer #10 · answered by Michael M 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋