Ok, I will sign it, my name is Ginny but I want you to get me his gum drop buttons for signing it!! I like shiny things!! Don't you??
2007-11-01 17:52:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by Ginny 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is also quite possible that there is a majority among media workers, public relations consultants and politicians (all of whom represent us better than we represent ourselves) who are in favour of redefining marriage, since these people are largely there because they are on a mission. It is also quite likely that of these 660,000 people opposing the redefinition of marriage, most are in favour of civil partnerships attracting the same rights in law as marriages, and are quite relaxed about what gay folk get up to in the privacy of their homes, believing it has nothing to do with public life or ability to do a job. There are those who feel that equality does not go far enough, and that siblings that have spent their lives together should not be caned for Inheritance Tax should one of them die first. What straights decide to call their committed lifelong partnerships should not concern gay folk. It is a bit of an insult to the gay community that they have to go back to an outmoded straight word, when they have the opportunity to make their own term a purer form of love than marriage could ever achieve. The overwhelming majority I believe are fed up with this issue taking up parliamentary time when there are so many more important and urgent things that need to be tackled. I believe myself that the State should bow out of the administration of marriage entirely, and leave it to the faith groups. The State can therefore no longer define or redefine marriage. Registration of a marriage creates a civil partnership, and with it the legal rights this attracts, and those entitled to enter into a civil partnership are much broader than those entitled to enter into a marriage. There would no longer be any Registry Office weddings, since all the Registry Office does is to register a civil partnership. There is nothing stopping the couple solemnising their partnership in any way they feel appropriate though.
2016-05-26 23:54:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by noemi 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I thought the Muffin Man retired.
Captain Kangaroo used to sing about him. I know you never heard about the Captain. That was a looooong time ago.
Glad to hear he's still up and around. Sure, put my name down.
Charley 128 supports the muffin initiative.
2007-11-01 17:11:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by charley128 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Of course I'd sign it. That would give Santa the chance to eat muffins filled with different kinds of flavors.
2007-11-01 19:19:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by Yabran Tariga 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I used to like the Muffin Man till he ran off with my Cupcake
2007-11-01 17:27:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by Kenny E 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I had to laugh, cause I worked for a company that made english muffins.
2007-11-01 16:26:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by jms043 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Cookies! Not muffins!!! People do not get it!! Next it'll be leaving Santa rabid animals so they can attack him!!
2007-11-01 16:24:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by ga_tx_1992 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Santa said last year he didn't like any pastries besides cookies....so, I mean, you're better off giving him a carrot or something.
2007-11-01 16:36:49
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No way! Santa already has enough problems with his weight and the diabetes.
He needs proper food...
like VEGETABLES..... :P
mhua haa haa! etc
2007-11-01 17:14:00
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Wow, you know the muffin man?? Hey, what kind of muffins did he make? Are they chocolate chip muffins? If so, my name is Peanut. Thanks!
2007-11-01 17:02:09
·
answer #10
·
answered by Mrs. Victorious 5
·
1⤊
0⤋