Is she real?

Question

In my previous post here I talked about john edwards being fake. I asked anybody out on here if they were real, http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AtYjVL2eSUEcrrUyOkNogBPsy6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20071101175131AABcNCB
I didn't tell anyone anything about me except that I was female. The girl named Tammy L nailed everything right and Idk how. Theres no pictures of "the baby" posted here. I dont tabout aids on here or anyhting. In fact that was my first post ever on yahoo answers I believe. She made me cry like a faucet. HOW THE HECK DID SHE NAIL IT ALL RIGHT?

My mother says its just right guesses.

Answer 1

I have a few psychic friends that are that good. I believe she is probably the real thing. I know some people don't believe in the paranormal and will find some way to explain it all away, but once you meet a real good psychic you'll be a believer too.

Edit. Your a student, like photography, you try to raise money for charities, you write a lot of poems, you live in the northeast, your name starts with a L or M, you wrote a book, and your computer died, your a Mac person like me. Old rock n roll. Overhead pictures? whats that about?

Answer 2

Tammy L. was demonstrating cold reading techniques and how convincing it is.
She wasn't right, she was just playing the same game John Edwards plays.

Now you see why so many people believe in John Edwards, keep your guard up, and if Tammy L. claims that her guesses were from psychic intuition, then run. I am guessing she was just demonstrating cold reading techniques.

edit: oh, haha, i didnt realize this was a joke. I read the other answers, I see you are playing both parts, the psychic and the victim.
I have done psychic readings like that, just as examples before for people and gotten them completely right, but I am not psychic, I was just using classic cold-reading and always tell someone afterwards.

Answer 3

This is an obvious fake steup where you post a question, have two ID's and magically answer your own question.
Look at the answerers profile. It is their first time ever answering a question and from all of Yahoo, they found the question about John Edwards a hoax just so good of a question that they had to answer it. Impossible.!!!!!
There is no way a person on their first answer on Yahoo would find their way to the back of science and Math , then to alternate and then to a boring question that has to be a setup.

If you want it to work, you need to generate a little more posts first and not be in such a hurry to fool people.
People in this section wont even believe anyone if it is real so they sure arent going to be so stupid as to fall for this.

Answer 4

FAKE.
Whenever I made a psychic read on here, the person who was asking always emailed me direct afterward, or at the very least they left a comment to me, not to the rest of the people, why would they care what everyone else thought if I just blew their mind by a good read?
I am not psychic, I research on the internet and people do not realise how much personal information they leave , everywhere they go, especially if they make friends fast and like to talk, they will tell everything about themselves on other websites, you just have to know what you are doing, not be psychic.

Answer 5

I'm going to have got to say no, they aren't truly. My residence is haunted (or I am haunted - whichever) and I enjoy plenty of paranormal undertaking in my house with little or no consistency. In different phrases, I may have a couple of weeks of occurrences taking place after which a time of not anything taking place. There's no truly consistency to talk of, so that you could believe that those men and women can come right into a house in an issue of a couple of days and get such a lot evidence is tough to suppose. Spirits don't care approximately cameras or budgets and can most effective proven themselves after they desire to. Ghosts are a bit of unique, they're extra residual hauntings, akin to each and every December tenth at such and such time a ghost will look down the steps and and so forth, and so forth. They aren't such a lot wise hauntings as they're a "video" recorded in time that manifests at that equal time, day, and so forth. As for men and women who don't suppose in spirits or ghosts, that is high-quality. Some people, despite the fact that, are extra touchy to the unseen global then others and are equipped to look, converse and are living with spirits.

Answer 6

To be scientific, this would not be genuine for one reason. The answerer has only answered one question. To prove that they are not related or the same person, the answerer would have to answer a few more from some of the established names on this site, not from new arrivals or new to yahoo, but people that have been around and even a skeptic if you want to sell it.

Good luck , you will need it.





right now after just one answer I have to say that the
questioner and answerer are same person, Until they prove different, I will say fake.
I imagine they will see it is a waste of time and go try it somewhere else.

Answer 7

You are right on this one PIXIE.

This is a weak attempt at a bogus way to turn the answerer into a psychic instantly except for one thing, they are obviously the same person, it is the first answer , like you said, plus the answer is no t general at all, and I have never heard a psychic go too far from general statements. You never would tell someone they have aids for instance.
sorry, but I cannot even say good try.
Lame

Answer 8

I'm sorry but I have to agree with most of the other people on here. A true psychic reading requires contact and that doesn't include the internet. The energy is shared through physical contact or close proximity. This "psychic" character can't focus her thoughts on anyone because she has no idea where to focus. You're making a mockery of a very rare and special gift and I guarantee you that this is going to come back around as a negative energy.

Answer 9

First off, use spell check and preview. You are very hard to understand! Secondly, even a broken clock is right 2 times a day.

Answer 10

In your previous post, you said "Lee" got everything right...but there's no Lee who answered. (Maybe it was Tammy Lee???)
This was your first post and her first post too? Strange. (unless you were both drawn to this section at the same time) That's really hard to believe.