Give ur personal opinion
2007-11-01 14:19:04 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Family & Relationships ➔ Marriage & Divorce
I am totally against it. I think it should be within marriage
2007-11-01 14:25:54 · update #1
Society really frowns upon it. You're considered a "Bastard" if you're born out of wed-lock.
I don't like that whatsoever, but that is how "the powers that Be" in society look at it.
2007-11-01 14:24:55 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
As a mother of a child born outside of wed lock...it is morally wrong...but it happens. Looking back on it, I wish I would have been married when I had my son, but at the same time I would be divorced by now anyway. Everyone is entitled to their own opinions, just be careful not to judge others as you never know someone else's circumstances.
I don't believe that a person having a child and not being married makes that person a better or worse parent. Single parent households raise strong, healthy memebers of society every day. Also, just because the parents aren't married doesn't mean that both parents cannot be involved and that child misses a mother/father bond in life.
2007-11-01 14:37:32 · answer #2 · answered by Tina 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it won't impression all people's marriage! Jehovah God condemns unnatural intercourse acts: Marriage in accordance to the Bible is between one guy and one woman. As shown in Genesis. Adam & Eve have been married by using Jehovah God--it replaced into no longer Adam and Steve! Then in the Christian Greek scriptures it mentions the be conscious "porneia" the place our be conscious pornography got here from--additionally in the Bible e book of a million Corinthians it mentions gay habit (condemning it and then) asserting " that's what a number of you have been, yet you have been washed sparkling..." after accepting God's tips and repented and circled! a million Corinthians 5:11-13 “ yet now i'm writing you to renounce preserving business enterprise with all people called a brother who's sexually immoral or a grasping individual or an idolater or a reviler or a drunkard or an extortioner, no longer even ingesting with this form of guy. For what do I could do with judging those exterior? Do you no longer choose those interior, at the same time as God judges those exterior? “eliminate the depraved individual from between yourselves.” What may be the information in the back of this tips? To repent and change around. undergo in recommendations Sodom & Gomorra? it is likewise a reminder of ways God's wrath might nicely be to unrepentant sinners!
2016-10-03 03:38:05 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I see the point that you are trying to make people have the right to have children out side of marriage it is there business and for know one to judge them.
You think people should wait until they get married to have children, So do think that when all people marry they are virgins to. so do you think that they shouldnt have sex before marriage toI have had children out side of marriage and they are the most wonderful children ,, I was married and had child and the marriage didn't last so having kids is just fine if it is your choice not anyone else if you want to wait to get married than that's fine to. There is two sides to this coin marriage works for some and marriage doesn't work for all .
best of luck
2007-11-01 14:29:26 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm against it. A child should have a mother and a father and they should be married...if you get pregnant the couple should get married. But only if they want to...a friend of mine was forced to get married when she got pregnant and now the divorce is causing her much more problems than having a baby out of wedlock would have given her. I think a couple shouldn't even think of having kids unless they are certain they are going to be together for the long run.
2007-11-01 14:30:42 · answer #5 · answered by neenbean777 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is totally right. Some people just never want to get married which is fine that is what they choose. So because 2 people love each other with or without that peice of paper, anybody should have the choice on whether they have kids.
2007-11-01 14:37:51 · answer #6 · answered by hungryeyes001 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think as long as two people are stable and in a committed relationship it is fine. I am unmarried but "living with my partner", he introduces me as his wife and I do him as my husband. We hvae been together for 8 years and have 3 kids together. I could care less about the religious standards, the way I see it my God will not judge me for loving someone and procreating and spreading that love. As far as I am concerned though to each his/her own, it's really none of my business, or yours for that matter.
2007-11-01 14:36:56 · answer #7 · answered by shannanm2783 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Personally being an old fashioned kind of girl, I'd have to be married before I would consider having children.
But I also don't want to pass judgement on people who are having kids out of wedlock. Honestly, if their kids are happy and are being well taken care of, what's the problem. I have my set of beliefs and values but I'm no one to press them on anyone and no one to judge others.
2007-11-01 14:24:24 · answer #8 · answered by Pretty Woman 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Who am I to judge? I am not walking in their circumstances nor am I accountable for their decisions.
Is it wrong to have sex outside of marriage?
Is it possible the condom broke?
Is it possible the pill wasn't strong enough?
Is it possible this person took responsible percautions and they failed?
In the big picture of issues that are ripping at us I hardly feel this is something we should all stop and condemn or cast harsh judgement on.
2007-11-01 14:25:43 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think marriage for the purpose of having children still has purpose in our lives!
It also help raising them to the point that they can be self efficient in their own lives!
2007-11-01 14:31:26 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋