English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

10 answers

Overthrowing democratically elected governments because they were too "left leaning" and replacing them with cruel dictatorships.

2007-11-01 14:20:50 · answer #1 · answered by Mrs. Bass 7 · 3 1

both the Dem's' and re pubs' can infrequently agree on something even at the same time as they pick an analogous aspect. except you bypass to c-span you gained't see a lot insurance of 0.33 party applicants. tremendous companies make wide contributions to applicants they help,you're restricted in how a lot you could donate to a candidate for my area. companies set up committees and communities to help and fund applicants. the recent financial disaster guidelines were written by technique of the banking marketplace for congress to make into regulation and it bit them contained in the butt. the different problem is that some human beings vote for a million party each and every of the time,both because they help that party each and every of the time and have self assurance it is the in easy words party to do whats accurate,or they're disillusioned with the different party for some reason. both events pick it their way and could compromise some to get their way. If what I study on the internet very last evening is even 1/2 genuine,this election would no longer count number besides. If we've yet another attack like 9/11 or a significant disaster before the elections F.E.M.A . will take administration and George Bush will grow to be the genuine capacity of authorities. If it takes position after the elections and before the recent president takes workplace,i do not understand what is going to ensue. G.W. signed an govt order for the continuity of authorities and F.E.M.A. will take over and droop the structure and the President might want to be the unity govt. Congress and the finest court will nonetheless exist yet would have little or no voice,the President has the superb say in all concerns. there changed into also yet another web site talking about the formation of the North American Union (Canada,U.S. and Mexico forming a union like the E.U. and the U.S. structure will be lengthy previous.

2016-10-23 06:05:05 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Not finishing the Korean War....Its effects are going to be felt more down the road of 20 years with a stronger China and emerging Russia.....With Iran and North Korea as Putin's allies.....this could become a defacto Soviet Union....

2007-11-01 14:33:41 · answer #3 · answered by Jay M 5 · 0 1

Not taking advantage of the weakness in China. We had the opportunity to change the course of history and choose not to make the difference in that country.

2007-11-01 14:22:21 · answer #4 · answered by rance42 5 · 0 1

In 1951, Mohammad Mossadegh became Iran’s democratically elected prime minister. To alleviate the abject poverty of many of his people, he quickly moved to nationalize the oil industry to utilize the profits to benefit Iranians. The British, who had significant oil interests in Iran, raised serious objections to Mossadegh’s actions despite the obscene oil profits they had made over the years in Iran, his offer to compensate them for the oil infrastructure they had built, and the British government’s recent nationalization of its own coal and steel industries.

While the existence of the Soviet Union as a rival world power precluded the use of direct military intervention by the United States, John Foster Dulles contrived a plan to crush the Socialist “ambitions” of Mossadegh. Disseminating propaganda through America’s mainstream media (including the New York Times and Time Magazine) which portrayed Mossadegh as a Communist while simultaneously utilizing the CIA to create a subversive environment in Iran, the United States succeeded in toppling Mossadegh and replacing him with the Shah of Iran. Representing US and Western business interests with great enthusiasm until he was deposed by radical Islamic elements in 1979, the Shah ruled Iran autocratically. SAVAK, his intelligence agency, tortured and murdered thousands of Iranian dissidents.

Like Hugo Chavez is in Venezuela, Mossadegh was anathema to American Capitalism. Leaders of developing countries who threaten the flow of capital to the Empire by diverting it to their own people quickly become enemies of the United States. The irony is that the replacement rulers America installs to preserve its economic interests are almost always corrupt and murderous dictators who foster deep hatred of the United States. Ultimately, Washington finds itself grappling with reactionary regimes which are overtly hostile to the United States, like the current leadership in Iran.

2007-11-01 14:22:07 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Supporting the military-industrial complex. Eisenhower warned us about it in 1961.

2007-11-01 14:29:38 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

We shoulda nuked those reds. Not the Cincinnati Reds of course.

2007-11-01 15:56:47 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

No nukes were dropped on the Soviet Union.

2007-11-01 14:20:08 · answer #8 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 0 1

We should have nuked Moscow.

2007-11-01 15:40:34 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Not killing Castro while we still had a chance.

2007-11-01 14:20:47 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers