Think about it, its not free enterprise. Too subsudize only certain ones or companies is a artificial control. That is not free market economics. Subsudies should be banned and the free market will let the best competitors rise too the top.
2007-11-01 13:41:53 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
There never was a pure form od Communism, and there never was a pure form of Capitalism.
2007-11-01 13:46:25 · answer #1 · answered by Ace Librarian 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Capitalism is an economic system, Communism a political ideology: You cannot compare apples with pears.
Which instruments will replace the disastrous dynamic of the Capitalism?
The capitalistic movement maintains, that only a "free" market can create a system which provides harmonious balance in society. The fact is however that "Capitalism" predominantly prefers the rich over the poorer and disenfranchised members of society - today in an especially glaring manner. Compensatory measures of the state and democratic decisions are increasingly being subverted so that global resources can be exploited shamelessly.
Therefore, the difference between rich and poor classes and the differential wealth of countries becomes more and more unsustainable on a social basis. Today's bloated praise about the "free" market is particularly absurd: The majority of the world's population does not have access to what we in the wealthier nations consider to be necessary goods and services. Therefore, the unfortunate owners of capital (= the shareholders) are not able to obtain any profit from this majority of disenfranchised individuals. Therefore the "free" market is not optimal for the rich classes and countries...
Social-democratic policy has tried to equalise the situation, but with its minority in the electoral process, it still can not prevent the rich making enormous profits at the expense of the poor.
2007-11-05 07:38:28 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know if its communism in disguise but it sure isn't pure capitalism. I don't think there should be any subsidies whatsoever at the federal level. No college scholarships, no farm subsidies, nothing. Although they've talked a good game in recent years explaining to us how much we need government "support" to accomplish anything worthwhile. According to the way I read the constitution article 1 section 8 describes the functions and duties of the federal government. Since the constitution was designed to limit government I have to assume that what isn't specifically listed as a function or duty of some branch of government is not a function or duty of the government. There is no place in the constitution, article 1 or any place else that says the federal government can or should subsidize anything.
2007-11-01 21:30:39 · answer #3 · answered by rick b 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Get rich quick schemes in the capitalist business world, (buyouts, IPOs, conglomerates, acquisitions, mergers, and the stock market), do not actually work. Remaining solvent does not actually exist within false economics capitalism.
Profit existing in the capitalist business world, or millionaires existing within capitalism, is pathological deception committed by the 21 organizations spying on the population with plain clothes agents, (with covert fake names and fake backgrounds).
Actual economics is the persons paying the monthly business loan payments of companies voting at work in order to control the property they are paying for.
Capitalism is the psychology of imaginary parents, false economics, and the criminal deception of employees that are paying the bills (including the stocks and bonds, or shares) of companies.
Anti-democracy republicanism is the psychology of imaginary parents, and false government.
2007-11-03 07:39:51 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Absolutely true. Subsidies kill capitalism. They have killed our agricultural market and are beginning to kill our other economic markets. Airlines, banks, lending agencies, etc. The more regulations you throw at a problem the worse off you make it, and the worse it is the more people convince us we have to pay for it.
2007-11-01 20:47:01 · answer #5 · answered by fredo 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I think you mean socialism. It is a partial step to socialism and for socialism to work you need communism/totalitarianism.
I agree end subsidies for individuals (social security, medicare, etc.) and for businesses (farm, corporate, etc.).
2007-11-01 20:48:23 · answer #6 · answered by sfavorite711 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
It's cronyism which is a big element in fascism.
2007-11-01 20:57:04 · answer #7 · answered by Jose R 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
LOL.....bless your heart. Lemme guess....public school education?
2007-11-01 20:46:14 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
you bet ye it is.
2007-11-01 21:10:42 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋