English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The equilibrium constant K for the reaction C (s) + CO_2(g) <--> 2CO (g) is 1.9 at 1000 K and 0.133 at 298 K.

1. If excess C is allowed to react with 21.0 g of CO_2 in a 3.00-L flask, how many grams of CO are produced at 298 K? At 1000k?

2. What are the partial pressures of each gas at 298 K? At 1000k?

3. Would you expect K to increase or decrease if the pressure were increased at constant temperature and volume?

2007-11-01 12:42:25 · 2 answers · asked by Forest green 2 in Science & Mathematics Chemistry

2 answers

I will help you to answer at 1000K and you do your practice at 298K.
The worst thing is that you forget to provide the unit for K. I do not know if the unit is atm, or mol/L, or some thing else.
Assume the unit of K is atm.
Since the molar mass of CO2 is 44.0g/mol, its initial pressure must be:
P = nRT/V = (21.0/44.0)*0.08206*1000/3.00 = 13.1 (atm)
Let X atm be the partial pressure of CO at equilibrium:
C(s) + CO2(g) <--> 2CO(g), K = 1.9 atm
..........13.1-0.5X.........X
K = 1.9 = X^2 /(13.1 - 0.5X)
X^2 + 0.95X - 1.9*13.1 = 0
The positive solution of the equation is: X = 4.54
Hence at 1000k, CO produced is:
28n = 28*PV/RT = 28*4.54*3.00/82.06 = 4.6 (grams)
The partial pressure of CO is 4.5 atm, and of CO2 is 10.8 atm. If pressure increase, K should decrease.

Assume the unit of K is mol/L.
Since the molar mass of CO2 is 44.0g/mol, its initial concentration must be:
n/V = (21.0/44.0)/3 = 0.159 mol/L
Let X mol/L be the concentration of CO at equilibrium:
C(s) + CO2(g) <--> 2CO(g), K = 1.9 mol/L
..........0.159-0.5X.........X
K = 1.9 = X^2 /(0.159 - 0.5X)
X^2 + 0.95X - 1.9*0.159 = 0
The positive solution of the equation is: X = 0.251
Hence at 1000k, CO produced is:
28n = 28*0.251*3 = 21.1 (grams)
The partial pressure of CO is 0.251*82.06 = 20.6 atm, and of CO2 is 0.0335*82.06 = 2.75 atm. If pressure increase, K should decrease.
Now you see how important the unit of K is.

2007-11-02 09:03:51 · answer #1 · answered by Hahaha 7 · 0 0

ok in case you've been due on the first April, you would have ovulated around the 18th March so that's extremely obtainable you've conceived then. it is person-pleasant to get era-form discomfort in early being pregnant because the uterus is stretching, in spite of the indisputable fact that it is also obtainable that discomfort merely skill your era is about to come back slightly late it is in a lot of cases the case (i have been per week late before for no reason). the probabilities of a pair attempting to get pregnant of succeeding each and each month is in easy words about 20% so it is nonetheless not likely. that's a symptom of being pregnant to get higher discharge, yet no longer greeny discharge. If that's greeny then you actually would favor to ensure a healthcare professional to rule out any variety of an infection. no longer STDs for sure because you and your significant different were both virgins once you had sex (me and my significant different were too and it would p*ss me off if human beings were declaring I had an STD, lol), yet there are different sorts of infections. i imagine because it is in easy words some days late that's slightly early to rigidity, yet in case you go away it some days and there remains no signal of a era then purchase a attempt and also you should get an precise result. good success! x

2016-10-23 05:58:57 · answer #2 · answered by coulanges 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers