2007-11-01 12:21:24 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
rizinout... good point but the child must be cared for until the adoption AND some one must pay for the "birthing expenses"
2007-11-01 12:29:06 · update #1
I agree....there are thousands of people willing to adopt children, who would also be more than happy to pay for birthing costs. Adoption couples are often pre-screened, so adoption could be finalized while the infant is still in hospital.
But to answer your question....yes, I would be willing to pay higher taxes. Goodness knows we have tax hikes for things an awful lot less important than saving the life of a child.
2007-11-01 12:38:13 · answer #1 · answered by transplanted_fireweed 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
First, abortion is NOT birth control, tho I'm against abortion for most reasons, I wouldn't change the law as it's a personal choice and NO I wouldn't be for more taxes.
2007-11-01 19:28:53 · answer #2 · answered by bizboy13 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Why would i have to pay higher tax`s,why not make the women who spread their legs with out protection step up and support her child,and at the same time make the man that enjoyed that goody hole pay his share,i got no pleasure from her why do i have to pay,typical liberal you whine about soldiers that are dying in iraq,but you have no concerns for the babies that are killed by the democrat/liberal supported genocide called abortion!
2007-11-01 19:45:03 · answer #3 · answered by truckman 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
no! there are plenty of people that will adopt these kids.the solution is to sterilize these females that keep having kids.they use abortion as a form of birth control.
2007-11-01 19:46:35 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
hmmm there is a thing called..Adoption. Why is it people are leaving the States to adopt kids from other countries? To much red tape and not enough babies. Why are raising taxes always the answer to libs?
EDIT: Well if they cut out unneeded socialist programs, and wasteful spending there will be enough money.
2007-11-01 19:26:00 · answer #5 · answered by rizinoutlaw 5 · 0⤊ 3⤋
I think the government should execute anyone who can't take care of their children....It would sure lower the unwanted pregnancy issue.
2007-11-01 19:35:45 · answer #6 · answered by Ryan 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Good point. Think about if there were no abortions in America, we'd have extra millions of people here that we don't have room for.
And think about spaying your animals, because if you don't, there are millions of unwanted animals that will be killed because they don't have a home.
I am for abortion and spaying.
2007-11-01 19:27:00 · answer #7 · answered by Flatpaw 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Or taking in a foster child.
2007-11-01 19:25:04 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
How about just sterilizing all of you morons that can't seem to find a pill or a rubber.
2007-11-01 19:25:19 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
They're usually against social programs too.
2007-11-01 19:24:33 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋