I agree, a lot of us feel about the Clintons they way the Libs feel about Bush. I just wish the Libs would realize it, so when the tables are turned they will understand why.
2007-11-01 11:57:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by Yo it's Me 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
i'm genuinely no longer a Hillary supporter--the sole time I met her she got here to a custom the place i became a delegate and insulted all human beings interior the room. yet i discover this question completely stupid, as a results of fact it exhibits a entire loss of understanding of what socialism is. Assuming you settle for the nicely-known NON-Marxist definition of socialiosm, this is the government administration of land, exertions and capital. consequently, the army is a socialist organisation which the form fairly authorizes to be privatized if Congress so desires (Article I, area 8, paragraph 23 i think of). Like maximum mainstream Dems, Hillary in all possibility favors some form of government supervision of a few aspects of very own company. The nonsense with subprime mortgages shows this could be a solid theory. you will no longer see genuine Socialists, such as a results of fact the Socialist occasion u . s . or the Socialist workers occasion, confusing Hillary's positions with socialism, in basic terms ignorant Republicans can do this (they'd desire to be ignorant, look at who they help).
2016-11-09 23:48:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by gurucharan 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hillary has a brain. That's the difference.
Not being flippant. Just being honest.
She can also put a complete thought and sentence together. To be totally honest, maybe both sides think the other person lacks virtues. But Bush maybe lacks them and is a bullheaded fratboy to boot.
And it's good to see that he's finally stopped pimping religion just to get a semblance of personal substance.
2007-11-01 12:35:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nope not much difference.
Now here is my view of the two:
Bush says what he means, has conviction about what he believes, sticks to his guns when he feels he's right, and professes faith.
Hillary is wishy-washy, a communist at heart, a person whose only conviction is to stand behind what the polls say at the moment, a person that comes across as very condescending, and someone that is too willing to do whatever it takes to achieve her political goals.
2007-11-01 11:54:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by Bubbles 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
Amazing, I could just have easily asked this same question, and gave the same observations.
Point is, I agree, and I think we all need to do more research and not just let other people get us hyped over these individuals.
2007-11-01 11:52:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
All I know is this - one party believes that the world begin 6,000 years ago, and the other one has "facts, numbers, data, history books, a proud agenda to run on, ect....." I think Republicans need to not worry about abortions, but start funding orphanages!
2007-11-01 12:05:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by SYSTOL 1
·
1⤊
2⤋
Neither are good leaders, both have money. I want to see a poor single mom be president, then we would see how important jobs, and education where.
2007-11-01 11:52:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Hillary was my state "first lady" for 12 years and did nothing for the state. She is totally for her own power agenda and cares less about America
2007-11-01 11:53:31
·
answer #8
·
answered by Tommy 7
·
4⤊
2⤋
Actually many Dems are beginning to see her that way... this last debate was a hoot....
2007-11-01 12:13:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Huge Difference.
Bush has done so many atrocious things its hard to keep count.
Hillary has a "(D)" after her name and is the wife of a successful 2-term president.
2007-11-01 11:52:49
·
answer #10
·
answered by Zinger! 3
·
2⤊
4⤋