http://www.nidataplus.com/lfeus1.htm
Clinton inherited a high unemployment rate from the first Bush; unemployment then decreased EVERY year (that's eight STRAIGHT years) while Clinton was Prez., only to shoot up under Bush II until, mercifully it began to drop after 3 plus years of zero job growth. Yet we continually the Cons & Repubs "bragging" that we have the lowest unemployment in many years.
2007-11-01 10:14:53 · 14 answers · asked by golfer7 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
You Cons really need to do a little homework. I tried to make it easy for you. Just click on the website I provided. Is that too difficult??
2007-11-01 10:23:30 · update #1
Because they are employed.
Next time, when the Democrats are in power and all these Republicans will be looking in vain for patronage jobs, that's when they will understand about employment.
2007-11-01 10:28:02 · answer #1 · answered by justa 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
gas expenses have no longer something to do with who's president. confident the elections impression the gas expenses, some months in the previous an election gas expenses decrease to practically no longer something, after the election they go way up back. so which you're question is beside the point to Obama and Bush. that they had no longer something to do with how a lot the gas expenses.
2016-10-03 03:06:57 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
And Don't Forget...Out Of 30+ Million Illegal Central And S. American Invaders, 5-10 Million Are Unemployed.
2007-11-01 10:48:30 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
ya, we are running on "funny money"
the treasury department should be brought up on charges of counterfeiting, theres no collateral to back the money that's being printed!!!
and those unemployment results are "cooked books" big time!!!
all the good jobs are being outsourced!!!
those of you that say things are great are not in the real world!!
of course that's just my opinion!!!
2007-11-01 10:43:57 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
More importantly there was no war, injecting trillions of borrowed money into the economy.
2007-11-01 10:28:44 · answer #5 · answered by Jose R 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
They support George Bush. What is it that you expect from these people?
2007-11-01 10:21:01 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 8⤊ 1⤋
The decline is joblessness has been greatly exaggerated by the federal government.
And anyway, it doesn't mean the economy in most areas nationwide is the best it's ever been. Because it isn't.
2007-11-01 10:20:51 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 4⤋
The rate is lowest it has been in years.
And the high rate was nothing like the one Reagan inheritted from Carter.
As much as you dont like it the rate does not lie.
The lowest in decades
2007-11-01 10:19:50 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 6⤋
Why do you liberals always look for the bad stuff, refuse to see the good and ignore the facts. No wonder liberalism is a mental dis order.
2007-11-01 10:26:21 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 7⤋
Yes, you must not read the business news, or keep up with business.
We have had the best economy in history.
We have had what is considered full employment.
If Democrats would ever break down and apply for a job, they would find out that we have a Great Economy.
But, no way.
2007-11-01 10:22:38 · answer #10 · answered by wolf 6 · 1⤊ 9⤋