Well, you could make the same argument about fathers and sons. I think we're better off treating everyone as individuals. I'd hate to be disqualified from a job because my spouse once had it.
2007-11-01 09:23:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Understand the truth of the matter... we have a one party government with 2 clearly defined factions. It does not matter which of the two factions within the party you support.
Does anyone not remember the smokescreen in Florida during the Bush/Gore election. Or the fact Kerry so graciously 'conceded' his run for office near the end?
The simple fact here is that our votes no longer count. It is a clever facade to keep us comfortable in the illusion that we actually have a choice in the matter.
When you consider that several members of our government have been witnessed attending Bilderberg meetings in secret with other foreign heads of state (which is considered an act of Treason) it should give us all a strong cause for more than just concern.
The bottom line here is that our trusted government is a puppet regime guided and controlled the globalist elite. They are manipulating more than just America. Already, our current President has signed documents that effectively Eliminate the United States, and also grant the office of President sole jurisdiction and power. Power to inflict martial law among other things.
These emergency camps that FEMA is building around the country are not for emergencies. These are Interrment Camps (concentration camps) where the Government intends to depopulate the US.
Has no one noticed all the cameras going up? Or that your vehicle tags and inspection stickers now come equipped with RFID Chips? Or that every Legal Immigrant must get a new Green Card issued (one equipped with an RFID Chip).
Do none of you realize yet that the new drivers licenses and US Passports will also have RFID Chips? Some Companies now require their employees to have RFID Chips implanted in their bodies. I can assure you that these companies are arms of Globalist Elite controlled companies.
Time for Americans to Wake Up to what is going on before it is too late. Source(s) Watch Zeitgeist the Movie
Watch Endgame by Alex Jones
Visit www.verichipcorp.com
Fear can be Our strength... or it can our weakness.
When the Grip tightens around YOUR Family's throat what will fear be for YOU?
2007-11-01 09:42:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by Shinji 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think a person would rate actual experience with how life was during these Administrations perhaps quite differently than historical recaps you present. Based on life experience since Eisenhower's second term, Ike created the Interstate systm, a good thing. Kennedy had ideas and moderate fiscal policies, a good thing. Johnson influenced Civil Rights, a good thing; he also expanded a War of Ideology, a bad thing (personal experience). Nixon tried conventional means to win the War, then pulled the plug, ultimately, a good thing. Nixon reached out to our adversaries, a good thing. Nixon was a scumbag, a bad thing. Ford, kept house., Carter, inept and overwhelmed, a bad thing. Reagen, America felt good about everything, hoorah. Bush 1, America went to War with a justification, a plan, an Alliance, execution and exit. America was proud, a good thing. Bush raised taxes, and the economy sank, a bad thing. Clinton was a good economist, saved the Balkens and stopped genocide,a good thing. He missed opportunities with Terroists by being Politically correct, a bad thing. He was a good President that treated Natonal Security as a law enforcement matter, inexperience perhaps, not a good thing. Bush 2 handled 9/11 on behalf of a startled Nation, and thru the Afgan military action, he succeeded, a good thing. He maintained the Iraq UN Resolutions with Britain, a good thing. He went to War on a false impression, a failure of our International Alliance on Security Intelligence, a bad thing. He relied on Rumsfeld's War planning and ignored Collin Powells "overwhelming force doctrine", a bad thing. Bush had an unemployment rate of as little as 4.2% and as high as 6.4%, not bad. He had a Republican Congress, then a Democratic Congress at a time when he, his Administration and most in Congress knew Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were insolvent along with every Insitution they had dealings with, a total break down in Governance, a bad thing.
2016-05-26 22:32:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by dona 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Since the Constitution you're waving around makes no reference at all to the spouse or other family members of the president, there's no constitutional infringement possible.
2007-11-01 09:19:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
yes the spouse should be able to run. Just because her husband was president should not be a reason to keep her out of office.
2007-11-01 09:16:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by Lov'n IT! 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
She has every right, as per the constitution, to run. To be elected - not this destructive spouse of a sleaze bag former president.
Hiltery has no experience and being 1st lady isn't experience!
2007-11-01 09:19:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
There is no law preventing a president from taking advice from a former presedent.
In fact, it is probably a good idea.
2007-11-01 09:19:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Well it is legal and it will be up to the voting public to decide if they believe she has what it takes. Personally, I would never vote for her because of her stance on a number of issues.
2007-11-01 09:18:56
·
answer #8
·
answered by libaki 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
Throw away the weed, man!
2007-11-01 09:38:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nothing in the constitution to stop her! You need to vote!
2007-11-01 09:23:17
·
answer #10
·
answered by coffee 5
·
1⤊
2⤋