She isn't my choice, but as the front-runner, she has to expect to be the target, of both parties, but I think she is smart enough to bounce back with ease. Giuliani also gets hammered, but not as much as Clinton, and I wonder why.
2007-11-01 09:04:47 · 9 answers · asked by ArRo 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
You always pick on the front runner and shes as tough as they make them. I didn't like to see the backbiting, the Democrats should take the hint from Reagan's playbook and never say anything bad about another Democrat. Instead they want to show how tough they are by picking on each other. Very, very, stupid.
Pick on Bush, that's a winning point, when you chip away at each other, they all lose luster.
Let them explain what they want to do and how they propose doing it and leave the smears and lies to the Republicans they have the experience and lack of morality not to care who they slander.
I can also see the necessity of dealing with the reality of illegals driving and being held responsible, but still not liking the reality of a situation that is not under state control.
When the feds get their act together the state and Hillary won't have to answer questions about states rights, and licensing requirements are a state issue.
2007-11-01 09:14:27 · answer #1 · answered by justa 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I did not think Hillary had to answer any really hard question during the Debates.
She danced around every question and no one truly forced the point, just a couple of jabs to give themselves credibility.
Look at the question about drivers licenses, she never stated if she agreed with the governor. She said she understood why he did it, but never said if she agreed or disagreed, no matter how many times the question was posed.
The others made light of her response but no one pressed her.
I think they are all posturing to be her running mate.
2007-11-01 09:11:52 · answer #2 · answered by QBeing 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
With so many conflicting positions on many issues, no, Senator Clinto was not unfairly targeted.
The front runners always get targeted.
2007-11-01 09:08:40 · answer #3 · answered by libaki 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
After being married to Bill all these years you'd think she'd enjoy getting hammered.
2007-11-01 09:12:36 · answer #4 · answered by John P 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Did they bring up her unwaivering support for the war?
Her vote to designate Iran as a state sponsor of terrorism?
The fact she's gotten more campaign $$$s from weapons contractors than any Republican candidate?
Any of her ex-felon supporters/staffers/donors?
Her time on the Wal-Mart board of directors?
Maybe she got off easy...
OK you got me watchin' the debate...they are bringing those things up after all! Woot! I'm content :)
2007-11-01 09:15:14 · answer #5 · answered by freedom first 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
She was not hammered. The other candidates said what they think. There is nothing unfair about that.
2007-11-01 09:10:37 · answer #6 · answered by regerugged 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No - the voters need to see her true colors.
2007-11-01 09:10:50 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no, the gloves came finally off.
2007-11-01 10:26:56 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
seemed like it was the first time, Hillary got some hard questions,.....i do not think she did well,.....
2007-11-01 09:09:40 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋