I would in a heartbeat. Either that or we don't get married. LOL
2007-11-01 08:41:45 · 27 answers · asked by Allen 3 in Family & Relationships ➔ Marriage & Divorce
Yes.
2007-11-01 08:44:46 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
If I was with the person I truly loved, I would GIVE him all that he asked for...
And if I were under the suspicion that the person I was about to marry was a gold digger, the relationship would go no further.
You are supposed to fall in love with a person, not a bank balance.
2007-11-01 15:56:32 · answer #2 · answered by Ms. GTO 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No I wouldn't. Marriage is based on LOVE and TRUST. It may sound naive to some people, because there's always that uncertainty, but to me it's a leap of faith. Gotta have faith in LOVE. Regardless the circumstances if the marriage was to end, I have no problem splitting 50/50. I value my dignity more than I do with money.
2007-11-01 16:02:10 · answer #3 · answered by Flower 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I would. And if I were to marry a very rich man I would not hesitate to sign a pre-nup. I would however have my lawyer look it over and make sure all the stipulations were fair.
2007-11-01 15:44:57 · answer #4 · answered by Poppet 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No! because in marriage there is suppose to be love and trust so i feel like if u can trust somebody with ur heart then u can trust them with ur money! Look at how many muti-millonare that it is on this earth with a bunch of money but still tryna find love.
2007-11-01 15:57:32 · answer #5 · answered by Tashay 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
IF I was a multi millionaire I would not be married to my wife I can honestly say that....Do to reasons i wish not to share...and yes they are personal and might be considerd selfish in nature but its my choice!!
2007-11-01 15:48:15 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
If I had a million dollars I'm not sure I would get married because I'd have everything I need at that point!!
2007-11-01 15:59:03 · answer #7 · answered by Rachel 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It would be very practical particularly since I already have children, but I probably wouldn't do it because I don't think the way to put your best foot forward in a relationship is accomplished by plotting its demise.
2007-11-01 15:46:31 · answer #8 · answered by Captain S 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I trust myself enough to not marry unless it is the person i will spend the rest of my life with and would be even more cautious with that much money! So for me no prenup would be necessary.
I do realize the importance of them though. I would suggest them to many people.
2007-11-01 15:45:50 · answer #9 · answered by ~NIKKI~ 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No.
Call me old fashioned, but I still believe that marriage is "til death do you part". I believe that once you decide to marry someone then you are committing all you are and all you have to that relationship. If nothing else its incentive to make it work. I guess they should be more specific with vows. Instead of saying..."forsaking all others" they should say..."forsaking all other" that way we catch all those pesky problems.
2007-11-01 17:04:00 · answer #10 · answered by chas 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes. Absolutely.
People change and what if, in say 5 years, they want to hit the pavement -- let them take only what they came in with.
2007-11-01 15:51:44 · answer #11 · answered by slave2art 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋