In your opinion is Water boarding torture?

Question

See you all can answer it, Why can;t a man running for attorney general JUST ANSWER THE DANG QUESTION

Answer 1

Waterboarding was specifically prohibited in a law passed by Congress, the Bush administration has declared that while it does not torture detainees it won't publicly reveal which harsh interrogation techniques may be used. I wonder why.??? Oh ya, Bush said we don't want to let the enemy know what we are doing.

So he won't say he's not breaking the law or anything else either for that matter. Oh ya, heir Bush is above the law I forgot his "(un)patriotic act".

Answer 2

I advise you seek for advice from certainly one of your very own a radio character called Mancow, who alongside with lots of the best suited figured waterboarding wasn't torture. He did it, he lasted all of six seconds and very straight away replaced his recommendations. Hannity replaced into challenged to have himself waterboarded for a $one thousand a 2nd by using Olbermann to the charity of his decision, he hasn't regularly occurring and its been practically a month. exterior of the reality that we don't could bodily undergo each human journey to show empathy, using waterboarding as a regarded torture is going back to the Spanish Inquisition and is particularly prohibited in the Geneva Conventions as a torture. the area of torture is often to extract suggestions to no longer completely disfigure or injury a individual. at times it fairly is utilized out of hatred or sexual perversion, yet thats no longer the area of militia torture. i did no longer say they have been signatory, i did no longer even talk something different than the origins of waterboarding being seen as torture. Yukio Asano replaced into the eastern tried for waterboarding. while you're fairly fascinated and not in basic terms enjoying there's a lot of infomation approximately waterboarding here.

Answer 3

Yes I do, but I really think all of those in favor of this line of questioning should give it a try before giving their final decision on the subject. If a majority of survivors still say it's OK, they should get a second session. After that we'll ask them again, and if they still think water-boarding is OK, I'd be glad to accept that vote.

Answer 4

America is supposed to be the BEACON of FREEDOM...!

That we have to even ASK this Question shows that our Country is going down the Pits...!

I remember a time where Iraqi Soldiers were surrendering by the Platoons to a couple of US Soldiers that were hopelessly lost in the hot Dessert, because they KNEW that they were going to be treated DECENTLY by them...

America WAS the Symbol of Justice which NO ONE could TOUCH when it came to Question of Human Rights !

Now we can't even ASK China to ease up on the Pressure against Human Rights..., they NOW laugh at us and TELL us to look at out OWN Record....

I WANT MY AMERICA BACK !

Answer 5

In my personal opinion...no. I guess what I don't understand is if peaceful means worked....we wouldn't need war. If simply asking a question got an answer....we wouldn't need torture. If stop that was enough for people to stop...people wouldn't be forced to fight back.

The second they be-headed the first man....sorry...all bets off....all agreements null and void. We quit playing by "rational" rules then. You can't fight a war under 2 different rules. They're chopping heads off and we're asking if they're comfortable enough? I didn't write the rules....don't even like the rules....but if it becomes "no rules".....then sorry.....anything goes.
They crossed the line.....they changed the rules.....they turned it into a barbaric situation......it's a sick shame there weren't people in power good enough to handle this without calling innocent people in the mix. Trust me....smack me in the face....don't go crying "abuse" if I smack you back. War is irrational....how low can you go seems to be the rule.....it's UGLY there. After enough times....you'd think humanity would wise up.

Seems we're moving backward.

Answer 6

Patrick Leahy thinks so.

Why his opinion should matter at all is a subject of some concern.

Imho, which probably should carry equal weight to his, suspects should first be tried by tribunal under the Geneva convention -- are they soldiers as the convention defines soldiers? If not, they can be and should be immediately sentenced to death as the convention provides.

For those sentenced to death, waterboarding is not torture -- they are legally dead already. End of problem.

Answer 7

If it gathers information from the animals--that saves lives-I have no problem. These aren't soldiers--and represent a new class of world enemy that some of the more gentile rules don't apply for any more. Break fingers--use a cattle prod--

Answer 8

No.

Is beheading an American soldier torture?

Answer 9

The only one who can do that is Jack Bauer.

Answer 10

Let's try it out on the people who don't think it is, and see if it changes their minds.