So Hillary says "Elect me 'cause I'm most experienced." but won't allow the National Archives to release any

Question

of the documents from her years in the White House that would (or would not) prove her case for being experienced; what is she hiding?

BTW, the papers are at the Clinton Library in Little Rock, AR. The library is managed by the National Archives via your tax dollars. President Clinton issued a blanket order making Hillary's paper trail in the White House off-limits to anyone who asks the National Archives folks at the library to take a look at them.

My guess is that the documentation establishing just what she was up to in the White House during the '90s would portray her in a distinctly unflattering light. With negatives in the 40-45% range she can't afford to p*ss off the women or the swing voters by showing herself this early.

She said during the debate that, really, it's not her fault that folks can't get at her record; no, she's sure they'll be made available "just as soon as possible".

So, it's "Trust me & elect me based on my experience.", is it? WHAT "experience"?!?

Answer 1

lol you never objected to "presidential privilege" ala bush

Answer 2

I forget the guys name, but he was a big Clinton government guy and was caught stealing stuff from there and sticking it down his pants , guess he didn't get all of Hillary's stuff out. You cannot be president if you are in jail. Must be some pretty bad stuff and we need to know. Maybe the republicans can send someone in to steal it like Bill did or maybe we can just pay that guy, that didn't do much to him and he can steal it and let the country know what happened. Well a republican doing that would be put in jail for years as there has a double standard between cons and libs in media and jail terms. Take care. Bush is helping the democrats, vote for an actor, they have a good history i the whitehouse.

I just figured it out. See during the clinton admin they allow ed the 25 years old (at that time) anti hijacking airline regualtion to be taken down, thus allowing and setting the stage for 9/11. The airlines were afraid of being sued by the ACLU for profiling. Figured Bush would have reinstated it, but did not. Then there is the stuff with Renos 2nd in comand (woman on the 9/11 commision) that built the wall between the FBI and CIA. But out of 1,000s of request by the FBI, they would not let the FBI go inot that terrorist computer, which had informaiton about the coming 9/11 attack. Can you allow the same type of animal in the white house? NO and you domos know that's right. besides everyone in know that works is a conservative (excluding senators) and the New York deal shows me that there are not that many demos or libs, if LIBERAL New York is against giving the illegals an id and feee vointg fraud. New York is not than liberal and that proves that voter fraud is out of control, instead of a divided country at 50-50, it's really 70-30, so no Kerry and Gore did not get the popular vote, that was rigged. Hope cons have good computer people to offset liberal fraud. take care. No more robots and devils in white house we need another actor, except Rosie!

Answer 3

So evidently you think that all the papers in any Presidential Library (under the oversight of the National Archives) should be available WHY? What papers do the other candidates have to show to the public about their 'experience' that makes them 'good candidates' for President? ONLY if you can say that every candidate must give ALL of their papers to 'everyone' and that the press will print all of them, can you 'knock' Hilary for 'witholding' hers. Hilary has been honest ... it's her HUSBAND'S library, and he made her papers 'unaccessible' for the very reason I've stated ... the other candidates DO NOT HAVE papers that relate DIRECTLY to life in the White House, and it would be TOTALLY UNFAIR to expose Hilary's life there when she is in competition with others that is 'aiming for' another life in the White House. By the way, it's usually 20-50 YEARS before the 'papers' in the Presidential Library are 'unveiled' and even then not ALL of them ever 'come out' ... so it is TOTALLY UNFAIR to 'demand' that Hilary 'unveils' her 'papers' to prove or disprove her 'experience.' The woman was a Senator from the state of New York, and THOSE papers ARE AVAILABLE ... as are those of the other candidates in their 'last or current jobs' ... and THAT is 'fair' and JUST. That is the 'experience' Hilary should be judged on, and NOT the 'years in the White House when her HUSBAND was our president.

Answer 4

in England people are elected after years of climbing the ladder to the top of the party making friends and not so good friends along the way ..like tony Blair who came up the ranks fast because he was dynamic and intelligent ........why is it that a nation so powerful and great as America have to give the presidency to son or wife's of previous presidents or to actors .....i don´t think any president of the USA has a damn thing to say about anything but is told what to do by the real politicians

Answer 5

Well, her years in the White House were as First Lady, not as President. Now, we would be very naive to think she didn't have a lot of input into what her husband decided in his capacity as president, but I am also sure that the experiences of First Lady are very different from being president. "WHAT experience", exactly.

Answer 6

There isn't a single person running for president that isn't rich and corrupt, republican or democrat. I would advise not spending so much time worrying about the clintons. Karma is a b*tch.

FP

Answer 7

I agree, she doesn't really have much experience. She screwed up her health care idea in the white house. What has she done in the senate?

I think by experience she is referring to her husbands experience...

Answer 8

Please! I'm sorry but the woman is so wrapped up in herself and her own desires she couldn't even keep her man at home. I'm supposed to give her the keys to the White House? Not in this life!

Answer 9

It would also make one wonder what else she is hiding possibly criminal activities? If I had to chose between voting for her or committing suicide I would choose suicide.

Answer 10

HEAR HEAR! Preach it brotha.
I totally agree with you. Even if I was a democrat I wouldn't vote for her.