the altercation of the space-time continuum bears no relative concept of adjournment and thus any possible altercation to this dilapidated system infiltrates the very core of humanity's existence?
2007-11-01 07:51:52 · 30 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
no i will NOT answer this q
2007-11-01 07:55:18 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The altercation of space and time is impossible. One would have to accelerate past the speed of light where as we know it your mass would be strung out into a singularity. Thus if somehow it was possible to fold time, as time is represented as a straight line, the energy needed to "jump" the gap would be greater than the energy needed to produce the top quark in constant succession. The "dilapidated system" you speak of serves us well and since we lack the ability to shift phases of matter we would never know the difference if our system failed. The core of out humanity is based on the predictable laws of physics, that's the stage we play out our lives on. If we lack the ability of prediction the the masses could be swayed into illogical thinking and doing. Evolution happens for a reason, God does not play dice with the universe.
2007-11-01 15:07:41 · answer #2 · answered by ROBERT C 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
... therefore in order to alter that dilapidated system without undue altercation or unnecessary adjournment, all that is required is to displace one of the related objects to a relatively remote distance so that the space continues a little further and time takes a while more to finally arrive at the conclusive confusion that such a concept concludes nothing within a space confined by nothing and with nothing whatsoever to hope, learn or teach.
2007-11-01 15:03:15 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The fabric of my continuum having been sheared apart by a reverse mechanism I already answered this tomorrow.
2007-11-01 15:01:48 · answer #4 · answered by Shona L 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There aren't any altercations in the continuum...The Black Hole has implemented the motion slurp which has dissolved and regurgitated cohesiveness.
2007-11-01 14:57:08 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
That's the Anthropic Principle. It's not so much of a question as it is a statement with a question mark at the end of it.
2007-11-01 15:00:09 · answer #6 · answered by Mickey Mouse Spears 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
My sentiments, exactly. Happy Belated Halloween!
2007-11-01 14:56:46 · answer #7 · answered by ~ Floridian`` 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
This isn't really a question, but rather more of a statement. Does that answer the question?
2007-11-01 15:02:57 · answer #8 · answered by J F 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
mmmm...it's got to do with entertainment n music..mmm..well...it's 2.37 in the morning over here.. i think i'll pass.. better hit the bed now rather than cracking my head!!
2007-11-01 14:59:23 · answer #9 · answered by finn 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
type it over again from the piece of paper,there is some spelling mistakes.
2007-11-01 14:56:33 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I just ask Einstein and he said the answer is yes.
2007-11-01 14:56:31 · answer #11 · answered by Love thy neighbour 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋