GO FRED!
Hillary is dangerous!
2007-11-01 07:27:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
by technique of standard Elections, I assessment the foremost participant's positions, words, and movements because one in all them will be voted into workplace. Like GratefulDead06, i have self assurance maximum cases like i have had to %. the 'lesser of two evils' because the guy I felt would do a more advantageous pastime changed into knocked out contained in the primaries. so as a lot as an autonomous party Candidate would have a good message and the movements to back it up, pole numbers that low gained't get them into workplace - merely be a spoiler to one events' candidate. i can not waste my vote on that end - it will be in the route of which of the 'evils' at that think about time i have self assurance would nicely be able to superb carry out the responsibilities of the President. And which will be whichever party candidate meets those skills i'm searching for.
2016-10-23 05:34:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by Erika 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
WHOA!! Fred Thompson does not support illegals. He has said get rid of incentives, no sanctuary cities, go back and get in line!! I agree he has no personality but our President doesn't need personality. That is what the Clinton's ,Kerry and all those other Botox creatures have.
Also he does not want to go to war but we are there and he will support our troops. He has done nothing to cause this lead up to Iran thing. But think about this please. He looks tough. talks tough and I bet Iran would back down if he were elected. We need someone with that image, not a pansy mansy or pansy womsy.
2007-11-01 08:38:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by My Baby! 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ron Paul
2007-11-01 07:36:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by Nighthawke 5
·
5⤊
0⤋
Duncan Hunter!!!!!!!!
http://www.gohunter08.com/inner.asp?z=4
2007-11-01 07:32:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by csn0331 3
·
2⤊
2⤋
President Obama
OR
President H. Clinton
2007-11-01 07:51:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
4⤋
The good doctor, Ron Paul
2007-11-01 07:50:10
·
answer #7
·
answered by ducktown10 3
·
3⤊
1⤋
excuse me but you dont even have Ron Paul in your question i would vote for none of the above and chose RON PAUL research him before you leave him out
2007-11-01 07:52:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
None of them. You've omitted Huckabee - he is now a top contender, and his support is growing each day. I sincerely hope that we all rally behind Huckabee and elect him to be president. Check out his positions at www.mikehuckabee.com
This includes the videos of his recent appearances on ABC and CNN, etc.
Track his national ranking on
http://rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_2008__1/daily_presidential_tracking_polling_history
Don't forget he recently came in second in the Iowa poll!
2007-11-01 07:44:17
·
answer #9
·
answered by Daewen 3
·
0⤊
3⤋
Ron Paul.
You just know he'll shake things up!
That's exactly what Washington, D.C. needs now is a good shaking!
2007-11-01 07:42:28
·
answer #10
·
answered by tom p 3
·
3⤊
1⤋