It just passed the house and is on it's way to the Senate, please read the following before you answer if you are not familiar with it...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/US_House_Resolution_1955
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/record.xpd?id=110-h20071023-31&bill=h110-1955
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2007/10/25/18456040.php
2007-11-01 06:01:55 · 13 answers · asked by vegan_geek 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
i kind of want to set up webcams in my house and car and maybe in my clothes that will go directly to gov intelligence
i want to sew my mouth and brain shut too
i want them to read this and every thing else i do
i want to basically ignore this bill like ron paul did
because you can't look bad about something you stayed away from
if i could i would like to sell, no, give my soul to the govnt
we've allowed them to take our best liberties
and freedom is definitely on death row
it's truly amazing what a little scare mongering can do
oh yeah
I think it's some nazi type of stuff
2007-11-01 15:05:56 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
It sounds like big brother to me. Looks like YA is on it's way out. This is just one more step in elliminating the Bill of Rights.
"3) The Internet has aided in facilitating violent radicalization, ideologically based violence, and the homegrown terrorism process in the United States by providing access to broad and constant streams of terrorist-related propaganda to United States citizens"
2007-11-01 06:15:54 · answer #2 · answered by Zardoz 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yahoo is a private business enterprise. they do no longer even could grant this selection to all people and can close it down the next day. They did that with their message boards on information thoughts. in short, they are no longer area of the liberty of speech or of the clicking suggested in the 1st substitute to the U.S. shape and that i at times experience melancholy over the transforming into form of human beings who've in no way examine the rfile or understand that Yahoo posts words and stipulations for this "solutions" characteristic and it fairly is their precise to accomplish that. it is likewise their precise to tug the plug in this selection in spite of the fact that if or no longer any law is handed.
2016-10-03 02:36:45 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
For a minute I thought they were going to form a commission to look into my marijuana growing operation .
The word homegrown had me read it carefully and unless they can connect my weed with a terrorist born right here I think I am safe for a while .
2007-11-01 06:19:15 · answer #4 · answered by TroubleMaker 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
On the surface, it sounds reasonable, but the devil is in the details. What happens when Christian proselytizing gets to be considered radical? There are many in the Democrat Party which would be in favor of that.
2007-11-01 06:14:30 · answer #5 · answered by plezurgui 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Leave it to the Democrats to terrorize us by trying to stop terrorism with a thought crimes bill.
There is so much wrong with that approach that it almost can't be addressed. Rip this bill up and start over!
2007-11-01 06:25:40 · answer #6 · answered by cornbread_oracle 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I think the language needs to be more specific about what they consider to be "homegrown terrorism." Would militia groups, who are protected under the right to bear arms be considered "homegrown terrorists".
2007-11-01 06:08:47 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 1⤋
Looks like the goverment would be aloowed go after "certain" people for what they say.....Not a good thing.
2007-11-01 06:18:21 · answer #8 · answered by ahedou2 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Kucinich voted NO.
Another confirmation of his backbone.
2007-11-01 06:13:11 · answer #9 · answered by Will 2 · 3⤊ 2⤋
liberals and ACLU -will not stand for it- rights of future terrorist are being violated-freedom of speech of spewing hate towards the USA,,,
2007-11-01 06:16:57 · answer #10 · answered by seawolf 5 · 0⤊ 3⤋