After the AMA testified that partial-birth abortion was medically unneccessary, after Congress voted to ban partial-birth abortion, the President signed the bill into law, the Supreme Court of the United States upheld that law and that vast majority of American opposed partial-birth abortion, Senators Hillary Clinton, Charles Schumer, Barbara Boxer, and others have introduced the so-called "Freedom of Choice" bill (H.R. 1964 and S. 1173). This legislature is heavily supported by the ACLU, Planned Parenthood, N.O.W., NARAL: Pro-Choice America, and others. (This means lots of money which need favors in return for). So, for Hillary (and the others, it's NOT about the will of the People, it's just about power and money! Anybody else see this?
2007-11-01 05:58:09 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Nicki, President Bush is not running for anything right now, even if Hillary makes it sound like she is running against him (she mentioned his name 25 times in the last Dem debate). Bill was tangled up in China Gate (selling missle technology to the Chinese - Hillary learned from Bill, right?)
2007-11-01 07:03:55 · update #1
Michael G: You forgot that Bill Clinton gave exclusive business to Haliburton in Kosovo, even when others were in bidding, so back off that myth please!
2007-11-01 07:05:44 · update #2
Many of us are able to see this, of course. Only the blind and loyal followers can't.
She's beholden to the Chinese, Large Corporations (including defense contractors), special interest groups, large unions.............. If she made it into office, I can't begin to imagine what the paybacks would be. I can tell you this, the voters will be the losers!
2007-11-01 06:04:00 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
Every American federal politician is beholden to China. Havn't you seen our trade deficit to China? One out four corporations that are up for sale is being bought by the Canadians and the Chinese. And believe me China will win in a bidding war between the Canadians and the Chinese (and if even Canadians will win they are still foreigners).
Hillary Clinton is getting the Chinese money right now because they are betting on her winning.... but IF the polls change then you will see more Chinese contributions will go to whoever's in the lead. Republican or Democrat or whatever will absolutely not return Chinese contributions... just like they won't take money from Halliburton or Wal-Mart or McDonald's for that matter. Politicians (Rep or Dems) would take money from a pedophile if they could without it being disclosed. Not a one of them would turn down money from any source if it wans't scrutinized. You know it and I know it. This is the problem with our campaign financing; every candidate (EVERY) looks for loopholes and are allowed loopholes in our system.
All of our politicians are being bought out by the Chinese. They ahev the money and the power. This war has contributed to the trade deficit. Who runs the war? Whoever he is, he's basically China's *****.
People should really start understanding national economics.
I don't like Hillary but complaining about her campaign fundraising practices doesn't keep other candidates from doing the same. This is a broken system, not a candidate issue.
2007-11-01 06:06:52 · answer #2 · answered by cattledog 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
As you may know, there is a limit as to how much an individual may ' contribute' to a candidate / politician. This same scenario has been happening along the Texas , Mexico border, for many , many years. The people who MIGHT be able to donate $1.00 TO $5.00 DOLLARS, SUPPLY THEIR NAMES, ADDRESSES, ETC., TO A 'PATRON', 'JEFE' or sometimes to a DOPE DEALER, HUMAN TRAFFICKER. The BIG contributor then adds a large amount of his / her money to the bits and pieces, making a large contribution to the selected candidate. This is a VERY COMMON PRACTICE, and nothing is done about it, as the 'precedence' was established generations ago.
2016-04-11 08:39:14 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
the Russians for Bills flight to Moscow during Christmas break from Oxford in 1972
2007-11-01 14:23:08 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not really. It's about political "leaders" giving a blob of cells precedence over my life, even when it would kill me.
BTW, the "vast majority" of Americans thought a partial brith abortion ban, if instituted, should include a health exception. But why let the FACTS inconvenience you?
2007-11-01 13:43:22 · answer #5 · answered by Elizabeth J 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Exxon Mobil, Halliburtan, Enron, Saudi Arabia,... oops thats the Bush list.
2007-11-01 06:15:34 · answer #6 · answered by Michael G 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
You clearly suffered a brain cramp between the question and the details. Try some good South American Kool Aid
2007-11-01 06:06:12 · answer #7 · answered by golfer7 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
The Saudis and Big Oil...no wait...that's Bush.
What does the "vast majority of Americans" have to say about my swollen prostate.
2007-11-01 06:16:14 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Hillary, Hillary, Hillary , Hillary sounds like a broken record. Leave her alone get off her back, I have never been so sick of anything than I am about the treatment Hillary is getting, just leave her alone, please. Get on old crazy Bush for awhile he is the decider and the divider all in one package.
2007-11-01 06:09:16 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
What the heck do the Chinese have to do with America's abortion laws?
As far as I'm concerned, Hillary is "beholding" to no one at all, not even her fickle husband.
2007-11-01 06:09:25 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋