2007-11-01 05:51:28 · 25 answers · asked by realitycheck 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yes. And they would find "evidence" to back it up by Al Gore, who would somehow blame it on global warming
2007-11-01 06:00:16 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 10⤊ 11⤋
I must admit that it is indeed difficult to argue against a known fact (for example that water is wet), however... remember the boy who cried wolf? That would be Bush, so if people refuse to believe him if says water is wet, then it is his own fault and he brought it upon himself.
2007-11-02 12:05:18 · answer #2 · answered by Shinji 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Quite a few absolutely would.
2007-11-01 16:29:22 · answer #3 · answered by Bleh! 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Liberals will need more information first!
2007-11-01 15:53:56 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Only those afflicted with BDS. Most liberals would have sense enough to know that water is wet.
2007-11-01 13:07:27 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 5⤋
Lmao! Yeah, that's about all I can get out of me now!
2007-11-01 14:08:31 · answer #6 · answered by xenypoo 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋
We would need a reality check then.
As I always get doubts when a compulsive liar talks.
2007-11-01 12:57:42 · answer #7 · answered by Will 2 · 10⤊ 5⤋
If he said water is wet at 100ºF, yes. Would he know the difference between ºF and ºC?
Did he already realized that liquefied gas is not solid?
2007-11-01 12:59:33 · answer #8 · answered by Mysterio 6 · 5⤊ 8⤋
Doubt it; I still think he is an idiot and a menace. If the chimp squeaks, its long past the time when I would have listened to him.
2007-11-01 13:13:14 · answer #9 · answered by planksheer 7 · 2⤊ 7⤋
They'd either argue the point or talk about how stupid he is for pointing out the obvious.
2007-11-01 12:59:59 · answer #10 · answered by cornbread_oracle 6 · 9⤊ 5⤋
What kind of crap is that? Am I supposed to be retarded because I'm a Democrat?
I'll believe Bush as soon as they actually find those weapons of mass destruction.
2007-11-01 12:56:47 · answer #11 · answered by luckythirteen 6 · 9⤊ 9⤋