Interesting that you asked about ethnicity and most people answered in terms of race. There IS a difference. If you truly meant race, than caucasian is correct.
If you meant ethnicity, as in a term which represents social groups with a shared history, sense of identity, geography and cultural roots which may occur despite racial difference, that will take a bit more research. Let me know if that is what you truly want and I'll be happy to research it for you.
P.S. Jim Jones was a mass murderer. The difference between mass murderer and serial killer is the time spread between murders. Serial killers kill in a sequence; mass murderers all at once.
2007-11-01 05:48:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by jurydoc 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
White men (though not an ethnicity....sorry)
What I find interesting is the fact that whites take the most despicable behavior that is mostly committed in their racial group and assign "high I.Q." to it in order to somehow excuse it. They glorify this embarrassing behavior through a system created to "measure" intelligence that was also created by white men. Fascinating. Those who create the rules get to justify their behavior and glorify themselves at the same time, while forgetting the inauthenticity of their "reality." Hence the idea that only smart white men are able to become serial killers--the elite celebrity criminals.
Just a thought.
2007-11-01 05:53:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
That one has a very definite answer and no matter of conjecture, or speculation either. White males of an age range in their 30 and 40s (like myself..... :) are the group from which the majority of the world's serial killers have emerged, esp. those of renown and almost cult celebrity status like Bundy, Gacy, Gein et. al. Yes, I should know this one, as I myself just MIGHT possibly be a serial killer! Hahahahah and I fit the profile to a T. Unmarried white male, does not date, loner, extremely high IQ, secretive, middle-aged.....
Remember as one fictitious serial killer once quipped before getting fried in the electric chair:
Kill one man, they call you a murderer.
Kill a million men, they call you King.
Kill them all, they call you God!
2007-11-01 05:48:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
easily, 'MA KISSES R fatal!!!' in accordance to the stats, Blacks are the present penitentiary leaders subsequently some distance. constructive, the stats are not *constantly* precise because of the fact I doubt they survey each and every Black guy or woman, even with the actuality that, information are the only 'information' we've. extra information stats are misguided is by using the fact regularly use previous stats to describe what's 'authentic' on the instant. those stats are 300 and sixty 5 days 2008, that are, certainly, the main as much as date stats i will discover. I doubt lots has replaced from 2008 and 2009. (+) meaning the two that suitable quantity or extra. 221,000,000+ (White inhabitants) (70%) 727+ according to one hundred,000 Whites are imprisoned. 727 ? 221 =a hundred and sixty,667+ imprisoned Whites. consequently, 220,839,333+ Whites are loose. 40-one,000,000+ (Black inhabitants) (13%) 4,777+ according to one hundred,000 Blacks are imprisoned. 4,777 ? 40-one =195,857+ imprisoned Blacks. consequently, 40,804,143+ Blacks are loose. the version: 195,857 - a hundred and sixty,667 = 35,a hundred ninety.+ consequently, in comparison to Whites, approximately 5 circumstances extra Blacks are imprisoned. As for the question, the share of the Black inhabitants isn't affiliated with the crime share, yet rather the *total quantity* of Black inhabitants. consequently, besides the fact that if 13% is a touch small quantity, in comparison to the extra advantageous share of the inhabitants, the entire quantity equals 40-one,000,000. subsequently, the quantity of Blacks in penitentiary, 195,857+, taken out of 40-one,000,000, continues to be below one p.c. of the Black inhabitants. additionally, as for the different component to your question, as a exchange of asking us, because of the fact we lack ideas interpreting understanding, ask the Black prisoners themselves why they dedicate the crime in case you could. All we are able to do is generate comments and assumptions, that are no longer information. No information equals no result, and extra importantly, no factor.
2016-12-15 12:59:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
As in number of killers or ratio of victims per killer? In the news recently, there have been a few serial killers who have victims in the hundreds (Russian), but as far as serial killers in other countries, that I am not sure of, as what consititutes a 'serial' killer? Someone like Gacy, who killed over 30 boys individually, or Specht who killed nurses in a dorm, or do you also count someone like Jim Jones who had his over 900 followers drink cyanide laced koolaid in the late '70's.
2007-11-01 05:43:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by momatad 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Human
2007-11-01 05:37:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by lulu 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Interesting question. Seems the obvious answer would be Caucasian males but that could just be that we hear of it in the Western media more than other parts of the world.
2007-11-01 05:46:24
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
white...they say that serial killers have a high IQ and are of genius level. i suppose ignorance is bliss. *wink*
2007-11-01 05:40:16
·
answer #8
·
answered by Hey U, Yeah U..Get over here 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
Caucasian?
2007-11-01 05:37:46
·
answer #9
·
answered by anan21uk 1
·
1⤊
3⤋
its usually white 30-45 male
2007-11-01 05:37:48
·
answer #10
·
answered by raudru83 3
·
1⤊
3⤋