2007-11-01 05:00:21 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Cultures & Groups ➔ Senior Citizens
One of my 'friends' his my reading glases ant I have a hrad time seing without my glasses.
2007-11-01 05:01:07 · update #1
Great answers all, even Goldwing's.
2007-11-01 07:50:24 · update #2
okay here goes, Inuit live in the Northern Hemisphere, nomadic and near the Arctic circle .. Australian aboriginals live in the 'outback' but there are few, if any, fully nomadic Aboriginals left .. I have been to Northern Sweden and Norway and there are a few remote areas there, with people 'living?' there .. most remote I have lived? probably one of the small islands off the West Coast of Scotland, called St. Kilda, which is now only used by bird watchers and is a reserved area. no-one lives there permanently .. I studied there for some years in the 70's
2007-11-01 09:59:46 · answer #1 · answered by The old man 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
There's one island in the South Pacific which is fairly remote. Only has about 60 or so people living on it. And most are related to an event which was the topic of a book and several movies. The modern day history of the place seems to show a pattern of people moving off the island as soon as they are old enough to do so. They have a fossil fuel generator for power. And, for many years, their chief source of communication with the outside world was by way of amateur (Ham") radio. Lately they have tried to increase tourist traffic. Other ventures into the modern world have occurred as well. Now, they even have a newspaper and a web site. It's Pitcairn Island where the mutinous crew of HMS Bounty wound up.
2007-11-01 07:21:48 · answer #2 · answered by desertviking_00 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hate to get serious on this one, but you know me....cannot resist. I suspect the most remote place any of us can live is in deep depression, for no matter how many may be about you, you feel alone, discarded, and useless. Even on a deserted island, a person could have goals and feel fulfilled...but with deep depression, there is no escape, no silver lining at the end of the rainbow. And, often, these people do not seek help, for the feel they are not worth anyone elses time...that to me is the most remote place a person could live. Love and peace, Goldwing
2007-11-01 05:57:34 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
Mount Everest, not at the top but close to the base. I watched it on The Discovery Channel. The Tibetan community sprang up as need for guides grew. They can withstand the thin air better than most people from other cultures. Climbers need to carry oxygen, the guides do not seem bothered by the thin air.
Thats all I can recall at this time.
2007-11-01 06:25:59 · answer #4 · answered by Linda S 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The Chuckchi Peninsula north of Siberia. Or Svalbard. Perhaps, some atoll in the Pacific Ocean. Those are pretty remote places. Antarctica is full of scientists and penguins.
2007-11-01 07:11:47 · answer #5 · answered by ? 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Northern Vermont. Wally, you can make the print easier to read on your computer by making it larger. Go to start, then click all programs. Then pick accessories then click accessibility. And finally click on accessibility wizard and that will show you how to make everything larger and easier to read.
Or if you only want to magnify just what you are reading follow the above directions up to where you click on accessibility. After you click on accessibility click on magnifier. This will allow you to magnify the section of the page where your curser is and not the whole page. Good Luck.
2007-11-01 05:48:12 · answer #6 · answered by judy b 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Perth in Western Austrailia.
2007-11-01 08:38:13 · answer #7 · answered by snow ball 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i don't think so. initially how are you able to heavily say that they had the superb technologies? individuals progressed the nuclear bomb until eventually now they did. in spite of the actuality that they have got been engaged on it additionally, i could say that our technologies grow to be enhanced. how are you able to assert they have been attempting to foresee the destiny? by capability of killing people who might desire to doubtlessly remedy problems? save in mind that many of their appropriate scientists got here to the USA until eventually now the conflict, through political persecution. That benefited u . s . of america not them. What their plan grow to be to exterminate another race that grow to be Germanic. you are able to't arbitrarily say that different races have not got the splendid to stay or that the worldwide could be greater acceptable off without them. worldwide inhabitants may be a controversy, yet you do not remedy this by capability of exterminating human beings. How could you experience if somebody desperate that's beneficial to die because of the fact of your race? I guess you are able to think of that's amazingly unfair. I do basically not see how any race can rationally state that they have got the splendid to elect what sections of the entire human race gets to stay of die. seem at Germany at present. they seem to be a western monetary device and wealthy in spite of the actuality that they seem to be a welfare state. whether if whilst in comparison with individuals, not many have great indifferent homes and BMW/Mercedes of their force strategies. you think of that they could have greater monetary freedom and prosperity in an oppressive government? I do basically not purchase your argument. The Germany of the Nineteen Thirties and WWII grow to be an exceedingly oppressive habitual that inspired mass homicide. It grow to be run by capability of a psychotic guy or woman who had no regard for everyone yet himself.
2016-09-28 03:20:53 · answer #8 · answered by cogliano 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Some places in the Scottish Highland are.
2007-11-01 08:43:37 · answer #9 · answered by penny d 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Deep in the jungles where the Aborigines live, wherever that is. I believe it's in Australia.
2007-11-01 05:10:03 · answer #10 · answered by Shortstuff13 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋