Are they doubley guilty, first in shooting him and then smearing his name with accusations of drug abuse and irrational behaviour?
2007-11-01 04:57:47 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Helini,
he sat in a seat in the tube. A man wrapped his arms around him and then someone ran into the carriage and shot him dead. In what way did he act suspiciously?
2007-11-01 09:45:59 · update #1
He may not have been a terrorist, but 'innocent' is stretching it a bit. I don't know or care whether he was here illegally or had taken drugs, it was his behaviour and actions that got him shot.
In the aftermath of terrorist attacks one cannot expect to ignore the instructions of armed police without consequences, and when there are guns pointing at you, you know what those consequeces will be.
Think about how many truly innocent people would have been killed if he actually had been a terrorist. Personally I hope that given the same situation the police would do the same thing again.
2007-11-01 08:29:46 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
They smeared his name to rationalize why they shot him. It's hard to do the kind of split-second decision making that police officers have to do, so I don't think they'll be convicted on those grounds.
2007-11-01 12:05:03 · answer #2 · answered by xK 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
yes, it's disgusting--btw do you no the cops who shot him were trained in Israel. It was all a state terror tactic-following the false flag attack of 7/7.
Zionists regard non-jews as 'goyim' i.e. cattle. just so you know who's got the power in Britain.
2007-11-01 12:05:03 · answer #3 · answered by John M 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
They were guilty of shooting him... then they just tried to cover up for their incompetence
2007-11-01 12:00:13 · answer #4 · answered by Beast from the East 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
who is Jean Charles?
2007-11-01 12:01:06 · answer #5 · answered by smars442002 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Who???
2007-11-01 12:01:48 · answer #6 · answered by Avondrow 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋