look,these bush fanatics are die hards,they cant face the truth ,no matter what you say it wont matter,they salute their furor....
2007-11-01 04:05:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by john doe 5
·
1⤊
4⤋
I'm not predicting. I'm basing what I say about what it will be like if she is elected by what comes out of her mouth, and what she has advocated in the past. Every time I hear her talk, it's about a new government program or policy that will be paid by taxing the rich. Sure, they can afford it, but it really hits the middle class more than it does the rich. The rich is the ones that owns or invest in companies that the middle class work at. Less money to invest means less bonuses and smaller pay raises to the workers, which in turns means less money in the economy. Taxing the rich more also means less money to invest in new ideas and new products. Not to mention it also means less money for the rich to contribute to the charities they currently do.
As for Bush, I did vote for him in 2000 based on what he said (didn't know much about his past like we do with Hillary). I was not impressed with what he did the first 4 years, so I did not repeat that mistake. I also didn't make the mistake of voting for Kerry, either.
2007-11-01 11:05:19
·
answer #2
·
answered by Mutt 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
Bad call, there isn't one person in this forum, country, or world leader who couldn't predict what the current President would do. You hear it from both sides: Left - "I knew he would...."; and Right - "Well we know what he will do with that." Everyone knows what this President will do, and I for one would very much like that from all of them, whether I agree with their policies or not.
2007-11-01 11:04:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by rance42 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
There was no predicting needed with Bush.
He did exactly what he said he would do.
We finnally got a president who was true to his word and now we want to string him up.
The country was conditioned by the Clintons. They said the crasiets things and looked at their supporters with a wink and a sly grin saying; "Don't worry, I'm not really going to do any of that crazy crap"
When Bush broke from that 'tradition', the liberals went absolutely irrational and haven't stopped yet.
2007-11-01 11:09:16
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
You conclude on a persons future behavior by observing their past behavior. it is simple physcology that is why what Bill Clinton did in the white house was not unusual just a continuation of past behavior..... That's is how conservatives can predict what she will do, it is really quite simple if you use that brain of yours.
2007-11-01 11:09:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by Ynot! 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
Because we had 8 years of Hilliary and not with Bush.
2007-11-01 11:06:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by ♥ Mel 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
Pisano, we are all entitled to our opinions. As for Bush, I disagree with you. That is my opinion. As for Hillary, I believe that she is a dyed in the wool socialist. That is why she is not answering questions directly and flip flopping like frogs legs in a frying pan.
2007-11-01 11:03:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
3⤋
Hilary has no chance.Obama is destined to be the first Black president of USA.
2007-11-01 11:03:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
I'm not trying predict how she will perform.
I am basing my judgment on the policies she has said she would implement.
That alone is enough for her to lose my support.
2007-11-01 11:01:08
·
answer #9
·
answered by Time to Shrug, Atlas 6
·
6⤊
3⤋
Bush has not performed poorly, that is merely your opinion.
Hillary is the typical Democrat, communist, socialist pig - nothing new there! We've come to expect this type of behavior from Democrats - history and all.............
2007-11-01 11:02:11
·
answer #10
·
answered by LadySable 6
·
5⤊
6⤋