Obama
2007-11-01 04:15:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋
Barack Obama
2007-11-01 04:01:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by Global warming ain't cool 6
·
5⤊
1⤋
Barack Obama.
2007-11-01 04:08:05
·
answer #3
·
answered by relevant inquiry 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
Obama
2007-11-01 04:09:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by Earl Grey 5
·
3⤊
1⤋
Obama
2007-11-01 04:04:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by Lisa M 5
·
3⤊
1⤋
Mitt Romney
2007-11-01 04:02:05
·
answer #6
·
answered by Sparxfly 4
·
1⤊
3⤋
Obama
2007-11-01 04:06:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
Wasn't the almost TRILLION dollar porculus (stimulus) immediately after Obama replaced into inaugurated the ambitious step that the Democrats placed all their chips on? They spun the wheel with 1000000000000 (with a T) of our grandchildrens' tax funds on the table and that they lost. After that, the Democrats very own the recession. The bailouts of Wall highway and of Detroit. The "shovel waiting" initiatives that heavily isn't waiting for years, while they could be inflationary, all it is Obama's and the Democrats. the only factor that Congress can try this has an instantaneous result on the economic equipment is to decrease company taxes. yet Obama desires to strengthen company taxes by using calling the tax will develop, tax loopholes. His dealing with of the economic equipment is akin to the three Stooges on the leaking rowboat drilling the backside to permit the water out. he's following the conventional Democratic recipe of amassing taxes, appointing czars like Elizabeth Warren whom the Senate does no longer make specific by way of fact of her nicely-favourite Leftist perspectives, and having the czars dole out the money for public initiatives that they deem worth. If it sounds Stalinist, it fairly is.
2016-10-03 02:22:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Obama
2007-11-01 03:56:41
·
answer #9
·
answered by ideogenetic 7
·
5⤊
2⤋
Mitt Romney
2007-11-01 03:55:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by G-gal 6
·
2⤊
4⤋