English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

But the people who believe that Bill and Hillary Clinton murdered and raped people are completely rational.

2007-11-01 03:42:49 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

16 answers

They are about as crazy and illogical as those annoying NAU conspiracy nuts. Lou Dobbs screaming points be damned!

To an earlier post:
LOL....Swift Boat Veterans for Fraud is NOT a reliable source.

2007-11-01 04:02:55 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

The biggest difference between the two groups is that most of the people who say the 9/11 attacks were an inside job actually believe that and most of the people leading the Clinton witchunt are well aware they are using lies to slander a political opponent. Anything to hurt the Clintons. If I said Bill once kicked my dog it will be front page news on a lot of conservative blogs tomorrow doesn't matter who I am or the fact I never met the guy

2007-11-01 04:25:12 · answer #2 · answered by justgoodfolk 7 · 3 2

the place are you getting all that trash which you particularly want to have self assurance? I admit we've a President that's treasonous! He has been charged by capability of an exceedingly honorable Naval Officer and Obama refuses to can charge him or remark on the fees! that's a nasty time whilst a President supplies Russia categorised information that no American can see. i could wait and probably a President that help u . s . of america would be a stable Commander and chief! A Veteran!

2016-09-28 03:14:07 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I agree with you on the 9/11 conspiracies and the Clinton death list. there's no credible evidence.

Juanita Broaddrick, though, went on the record and allowed herself to be questioned about this. and elements of her story were corroborated by independent investigation.

When Bill Clinton was asked about her accusations, he refused to answer them. The refusal to take the question was enough to convince some that Bush was a full-blown coke head. So, using the same standard, one can certainly conclude that Clinton raped this woman. And I know of no named person going on the record to allege Bush's cocaine use.

2007-11-01 04:30:09 · answer #4 · answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7 · 1 2

The problem with any conspiracy is once begun it only festers into more and sinister conspiracies. Most issues can be taken at face value.

2007-11-01 03:47:35 · answer #5 · answered by rance42 5 · 7 0

Too funny. Too true. And don't forget those kooky guys able to turn a blind eye to bush's rampant criminal activity in the White House!

What a hoot!


And the "Clinton body count" has been debunked.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/bodycount.asp

2007-11-01 04:28:31 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

It all came to light when Rosie O explained to the world that fire doesn't melt steel!

But how about 20,000 gallons of unspent high octane aviation fuel, that CAN soften steel after an hour of intense heat so the girders won't support 50,000 tons of concrete and steel resting above it.
They are misguided and foolish and were taught to disrespect authority in any form, even a former Prasident as sorry as William Jefferson Clinton deaserves our respect as the President! and they did dare to shoot him to distraction. And he helped creat this bunch of morons.

2007-11-01 03:55:24 · answer #7 · answered by ? 6 · 1 5

Lol, I know. One conspiracy theory for another. Something would have leaked or someone would have talked regarding either situation.

2007-11-01 03:47:20 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 5 2

I think it speaks volumes about their own personal value systems.

2007-11-01 03:51:55 · answer #9 · answered by Phil M 7 · 5 0

I didn't even know that skulls can be raped,
before I found some non-PC French comics.

2007-11-01 03:48:00 · answer #10 · answered by Will 2 · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers