give the remarks also in a bracket()
2007-11-01 03:26:58 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Cricket
from my point of view Shoaib Akhtar is a better bowler than Sreesanth because shoaib has experience of bowling equal to the half age of sreesanth moreover he has strength and some match winning skills aswell especially his slow fulltosses are awesome really believe or not......
good luck
(Alastair)
2007-11-01 04:09:02 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is not proper to compare them right now. Shoaib has loads of experience in international cricket, but, Sreesanth has been playing at the international level for the past 1 or 2 years only. Sreesanth can be a better bowler provided he does not give away too many wides or runs and controls his aggression and emotions.
2007-11-02 02:15:23 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Shoaib Akthar - he is the fastest bowler in the world, earning him the name Rawalpindi Express. He set a world record by clocking 100mph twice. His ability to bowl fast yorkers, well disguised slow balls, swinging deliveries, and sharp bouncers made him lethal even on dead pitches.
From 176 matches Rawalpindi express guy has taken 377 wickets where Sreesanth has played just 42 matches & has taken 90 wickets.
Shoiab Akthar is a legend.
2007-11-01 11:57:48 · answer #3 · answered by Nafeez Nash 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Shoaib Akhtar
2007-11-01 19:36:49 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
this isnt a fair question. i ll ask a question now... is sachin a better batsman or abdur rehman??? u cant compare a legend like sachin with some youngster.
shoaib is a legend and sree is a youngster. this question is just to prove that a pakistani bowler is better than an indian bowler.
2007-11-01 19:47:54 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sreesanth can be no comparison to Shoaib Aktar, who is the fastest bowler in the bowler. If Shoaib Aktar forget his ego and start behaving well, he can be a best bowler in the world.
2007-11-01 11:47:44 · answer #6 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Shoaib's bowling is better than Sreesanth. Sreesanth looks promising as of now. It will depend upon how Sreesanth grooms himself in the future and makes best use of his talent.
But, just as of now, Shoaib is much better than Sreesanth for sure.
2007-11-01 10:37:41 · answer #7 · answered by Asif 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Both r known for their behaviour on and off the field ,not for their perfomance.Sreesanth can dance well and Akthar is a good singer so i will go with none.
2007-11-01 13:52:49 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Sreesanth is the best bowler.He turly gets under the skin of the batsmen.
2007-11-01 11:09:47 · answer #9 · answered by Neel D 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I just don't think.
And I don't think they compare. They are both different with diff psyche.
Shoiab's skills are well known. He needs to be steady.
Sree is a raw hand. Has a long way to go.
2007-11-01 10:37:42 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋