English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Two conservative bloggers have finally filed a complaint with the Federal Election Commission, challenging that Hillary Clinton accepted illegal contributions to her presidential campaign.

Hold on! Hillary doing something illegal? Why that's nothing but right wing HATE speech! Everybody knows that Hillary would never do anything illegal! Right?

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1007/6643.html

2007-11-01 03:25:04 · 32 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

32 answers

It's a good morning isn't it !

http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-clinton17oct17,0,2244470.story?coll=la-home-center

http://www.fec.gov/info/PartyGuide/Chapter10.htm

Thanks for the updates. Here's some back at'ya to add to your link sources. Seems maybe why she and Bill are a bit on edge lately . He yelled at hecklers re:9/11 and she made a mes of Tuesday's debate. Did you read her campaign is calling on donors for more money to fight off further attacks. As if 300 odd mil is not enough.

edit: anti lib has the link re: more money thanks!! AND above I included one that states refusal to return all the illegal funds...
Campaign Manager is a she, Patty Solys Doyle, a long time devoted family friend... Mark Penn may feel the heat. Like the MacDougals(sp?) & White water they could care less about friendships when the warrants start flying.
... and of course nothing like some burnt toast for breakfast... I pray God's will be done... as to getting down on the knees you really wanna go there on this question? Wake up dear!

2007-11-01 03:41:18 · answer #1 · answered by Mele Kai 6 · 4 2

I think that even if she got drunk and ran her car up the stairs of the White House the Democowards would turn it into some sort of Anti Bush thing.

Kerry would try the same stunt next election and say he was having flash backs of Vam when he was in his gun boat, however his thunder would be taken away because during all the fuss Secret Service stumbles in and finds Rosie O'Donnell in the sack with Hillary.

Hillary is reelected, and Rosie becomes Secretary of Defense.

Rosie orders all M1A1 Tanks to have flowers put in the barrels and Soldiers have to watch re runs of "The View".

Hillary using "white out" on the 2nd Amendment and has house to house searches for guns and knifes, they are all melted down to make a big steel wall around her home.

The blood groove is removed from all American Military bayonets on her orders so that in her words "You get time to think about what you did".

Rosie and Hillary force an open gay military and fire all who oppose it in the military, 90% of top brass is fired, military recrute numbers fall so she forces a draft and truns all willing jailed cons to active duty.

Iran takes over the middle east killing thousands of UN and American Troops.

The next day she blames Bush.

Most America accept it asBush's falt for everything.

His dead body is dug up and burned in Time Square.

Canada reports nuke strikes on America.

2007-11-01 19:08:19 · answer #2 · answered by RAMairGTO72 3 · 0 0

It is about time someone files this complaint. But watch the news carefully and you will see that Matthew Margolis and Mark Noonan will mysteriously have legal problems or die. It is the Clinton way to silence those who speak the truth about the Clintons.


EDIT: Isn't funny how all the liberals that have responded "conservative bloggers" and then summarily dismiss the entire LA Times article. But whenever they quote liberal bloggers as facts, we are called names and slandered simply by questioning the source. Here we have a liberal newspaper providing all the proof and evidence needed for justice to be levied and all of a sudden, they are not a reliable source. What hypocrites liberals are!

2007-11-01 05:48:18 · answer #3 · answered by Michael H 5 · 1 1

I'm not trying to defend Clinton but you there is nothing connecting Hillary Personally being involved in anythign illegal here.

Yes a fundraiser for her campaign made some illegal moves in obtaining and bundling contibutions to her campiagn, and her campaign should have kept a better look out for items of this nature to ensure they are properly following the law, but Hillary herself was not involved. So if you are going to make accusations direct those accusation appropriatly. You can accuse Hillary's campiagn of illegal activity or you can accuse a contributor to Hillary's campiagn of illegal activity.

The same goes with Giulani's campiagn. Who has also had legal troubles in regards to some of his campiagn's contributions.

2007-11-01 04:07:55 · answer #4 · answered by labken1817 6 · 2 0

That's nothing but more of the right trying to smear the next President of America. Typical and quite frankly boring. What the American right doesn't seem to understand is that at this point all this mudslinging and wild unfounded allegations against Hillary, her character and integrity are only more proof the right wing is obsessed and afraid of the Clintons; The far right fringe might be very jubilant about this slander and nonsense for everyone else this are none issue's that show the need for America to free itself from the far right dark cloud and breath again.

Hillary will win the Presidency and Americans will be better of. She'll save America from the regressive right and make the US more like the founding fathers wanted in the first place

2007-11-01 03:47:03 · answer #5 · answered by justgoodfolk 7 · 3 4

While it's not completely out of the realm of possibility, I think that there is a lot of circumstancial evidence but really not much proof. Besides, it's highly likely that if push comes to shove, Hillary will claim no knowledge (a little political caviat passed down from Nixon to Reagan to Bill..ect) of any wrongdoing and simply fire her campaign manager - then replace him.
It will also be perceived that these two bloggers have a fairly large axe to grind.

2007-11-01 03:41:45 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

I am a liberal, but I don't support Hillary. She may be a democrat, but she is not a true liberal. She is a member of CFR, and has attended Bilderberger meetings, and is pro NWO. There is really no difference between Rebublicans and Democrats at the highest levels. They only pretend to believe in different things. But (with a couple of exceptions) they all get their campaign money from the same people, and they are obliged to further the same agendas. These agendas do not benefit the people in any way, shape, or form. People really need to wake up and realize that Liberals and conservatives need to set aside their differences, at least for the time being, and join forces as humans versus the NWO. We can still stop this coming nightmare, but it will take large numbers of us. Please watch the documentary called endgame. *sm*

2007-11-01 04:00:48 · answer #7 · answered by LadyZania 7 · 0 4

I'm fairly sure that Hillary Clinton is the devil and was sent here in a communist conspiracy to try and overthrow the government!
If not; if the right wing haters are going to hate somebody at least it is Hillary Clinton -- she's so far to the left. When she looked right at her eyes cross

2007-11-01 03:41:42 · answer #8 · answered by J W 3 · 3 2

I haven't had a chance to see it yet, but I've heard

that Peter Paul has an interesting video on

youtube about the Hillary syndicate.

2007-11-01 03:38:51 · answer #9 · answered by realitycheck 3 · 2 2

You know, if I could absolutely count on her loyalty, Hillary should be made head of the CIA or NSA. She's good at all that cloak and dagger stuff. I hope that we can dig up enough of her buried past and current dealings to show America how corrupt she really is.

2007-11-01 03:48:22 · answer #10 · answered by SteveA8 6 · 3 3

fedest.com, questions and answers