Should prostitution be considered immoral if the man paying for it is severely disabled?

Answer 1

I do not believe prostitution is immoral unless they are forced into providing the service.
I suspect many severely disabled people will find it much harder to get a partner than the able bodied, if anything it is more moral for them to use a prostitute, as it may be the only sexual experience they can obtain.

Answer 2

A lot of people are missing the point here - I think the questioner is coming from the angle that prostitution is immoral, but other considerations notwithstanding is it immoral when it's a severely disabled guy that's got zero other chance of getting laid?

Personally I think either prostitution's either moral or immoral, if you make exceptions then you're concluding it's moral.

For what my opinion's worth (ie zilch, same as all yours), the number one concern has to be the woman. If she isn't being coerced then she should have a right to do what she wants.

Answer 3

What do you mean by severely disabled? Do you mean as in a learning disability, or a physical disability?

And whichever you mean, are you suggesting the immorality is found in the fact that a disabled man is using the service?

I think that you need to think about your question a bit more.

Answer 4

I don't feel it makes a difference.

Is the man married? Does he have what is considered an exclusive relationship with another sexual partner? Then yes, it is immoral.

If he is single and the woman was not coerced into prostitution, then (I feel) there is no immorality.

His physical disability is irrelevant.

Answer 5

I don't understand the relevance of the man being disabled. It should either be moral or immoral. Morals are finite, they don't change due to circumstances. Personally, I believe what goes on in the bedroom is none of my business. As long as no minors are involved, and both adults are consenting, let the good times roll.

Answer 6

Why should it matter if the man is severely disabled? Prostitution is always immoral and would be in some countries illegal. Plus if we a talking seriously disabled would they be able to make the decision to pay for sex.

Answer 7

It should be legal anyway.

I dont think it is immoral. Unless the girl (or man) is forced to do it.

You can kind of tell if the girl is the kind who enjoys it or not. Maybe the disabled person should offer more money to compensate if she thinks its a bit weird

Answer 8

Some would argue that prositution is immoral no matter what the other circumstances are. But my answer is "no" unless the diability is a mental disability in which the customer is incapable of knowing what is going on.

Answer 9

ok, im severely disabled, one arm one leg and a wheelchair...

my dick still works, and ive got a wife and 4 kids...

prostitution is mereley illegal, it is NOT immoral. only prudes regard it as such...probably because they cant tax it at source!

so, for the likes of me, its a NO NO, but johnny good looking, well, he's OK... and doesnt get castigated... or persecuted, and yet, he can have any girl who wants to sleep with him.. (so why does he have to resort to prostitutes?)

i have never paid for sex directly. im married, so i get screwed every which way.. anyway. but to differentiate a pay and morality scale based on disability.. wow, thats state fascism... youll be wanting to try eugenics next...

Answer 10

It shouldn't be classed as immoral anyway, these ladies earn a living and provide a service to a very interested market. legalise it and take it off the streets to make it safer that's what i say.