because they are trying to justify a war that has no justification
2007-10-31 20:43:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Ahmadinajad has stated that he whats to wipe Isreal off the map and kill "The Great Satan" the USA. As a committed radical Muslam, this is in keeping with his religeous beliefs and anything he can do to make if happen would increase his rewards in Muslam Heaven.
North Korea is an economic basket case and has little to gain from attacking anyone except So Korea, which is protected by the US military in keeping with the UN ceasefire agreement. They would come under UN sanctions (whatever good that would do) if they were to start up the war again. Any gain to No Korea would be a short lived suicide pact for the No Korean regime.
Pakistan is our Ally and is not a threat unless the crazies (radical muslams) would take over the country.
I can't get over the vitriol from the left regarding issues of the Middle East. The war with Iraq was approved by Congress. The same intelligence possed by the administration was available to the Congress. The available intelligence was that which was gathered by the previous Clinton administration. Remember, Bush was in office less than a year when 911 occurred and he had only the intellicence produced by the previous administration to go on. It is evident that Democrats has no historical memory. They will believe what they want regardless of history and fact.
Lastly, if we get out of the Middle East, there will be a bloodbath between the opposing Muslims, AND the potential for serious disruption of the worlds oil supply. I know the left wing crazies would welcome this, but the same left wing crazies would have to then live in an economic recession that would make the 1930s look like a prosperity to the civilized world. Even Hillery Clinton's socialist government would not have the money to support their sorry asses in the manner to which they are accustomed.
2007-11-01 00:51:34
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Israel and the Zionist Jewish lobby is pushing for an attack on Iran, and they seem to have a very powerful control of both parties. Also, the economy is in a mess and the Republicans have been the main culprits for this mess so they hope that an invasion along with right media spin would divert the attention of the public which so far have been pretty gullible. There's good hope they can be deceived again by another lie and another manufactured disaster. By the way, too, there are some huge corporations who are making mint from these insane wars which are robbing the American people from budget for domestic policy, for example on health and education.
2007-10-31 21:03:42
·
answer #3
·
answered by peace m 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
None of the countries above are threats.
Iran just like iraq, is bush's oil target and ito satisfy israel.Both pakistan and and N korea dont fall in that category.
For the record, repubs have no evidence that iran sponsers terrorism at all.For the idiot who says they are spreading shia, when did they do that? U dont want them to follow their religion?
Actually americans helped iran with nuclear program back in 1950s. later it was abandoned but when they continued it in the late 80s (when iran was US enemy).
So irans nuke program is nothing new and we started it so now in 2004 or so Bush is talking crap about it as he sees a new opportunity. if it was really a threat why didnt clinton or Bush Sr did anything about it and only Bush jr is the only one complaining?
One thing about all countries or "terror groups" US has counquered remains the same, they were all sponsered and created by america, when they stop being america's puppet or disobeys israel, they becomes enemy.
EDIT: Why would saddam fire at our air craft if it havnt illegally entered their air space?
2007-10-31 21:17:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Funny I heard Hillary say as Much! and there is a diffference between a Bully sitting next to the worlds oil supply and a Guy that sits way out in nowhere overlooking a cold stretch of the Pacific Ocean. Last we Looked Pakistan was an ally.
2007-10-31 22:33:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
North Korea - run be a lunatic threatening to apply nuclear weapons Iran - a violent dictator killing his very own human beings, who needs to wipe Israel off the map Pakistan - the main deadly u . s . in the worldwide. The Taliban needs to take over the rustic. u . s . is stuffed with violent enthusiasts. WW3 2012
2016-12-30 12:05:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The neoconservative Republicans believe that Iran could lead a regional war to take over Israel and turn it into a Muslim state. Although Iran is at least 5 years away from having a nuclear weapon, the imminent threat is that neocons may lose the Presidency in 2008, and that they have only 14 months to strike Iran.
2007-10-31 20:18:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
4⤋
north korea has bowed down to sanctions and is acting right, for a change. FINALLY!
pakistan is our allie and very imporatnt to us.
iran threatens the middle east. especially since they will want to invade iraq as soon as we leave. if we could get russias approval, i would go to war with iran now. might as well do it while all our stuff is over there in iraq. at the very least, with russian acceptence, i would bomb them back to the stone age so we wouldnt have to worry about the bastards for awhile. maybe the russkies can keep 'em in line though....maybe.. it's on them if they can't! shoot i'm ready to fight those corrupt ruskies too though!
2007-10-31 20:36:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
I don't understand why they think that America, a country with alot of nuclear weapons, has a right to bomb a country to prevent it from creating a nuclear weapon to deter a nuclear attack which they have been threatened with by America. Iran is operating in self-defense and Ahmadinejad is smart enough to recognize that nuking somebody would be crazy.
Iran's enemies in Israel and America have alot of nukes, so why don't the Iranians have a right to their own weapons to defend themselves?
Pakistan is not a threat to America, even though that is probably the home of Osama bin Laden, the leader of the only group that has attacked America.
North Korea poses no threat to America and America is preventing peace and even possibly reunification of Korea (under the Southern government) by keeping troops there.
At the moment, we need to go after Osama bin Laden, not seek out grand victories against non-enemies reminiscent of Mussolini's war against Ethopia.
2007-10-31 20:13:58
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
3⤋
Decode this lyrics " It's up to you"
Ever wonder who do not know what is the definition of Israel?
Luke 9.25
Ever wonder who do not know the definition of the Jew?
And who were the Jew?
Luke 3.7-9
Ever wonder who do not know that living human kind do not know how to create living human kind into mankind to be the Son of God with total loss of our creator's universal gifts of life vital for the survival and advancement of their own little ones, own children, own generation and living human kind in pulling out the plugs off with them surviving and running on batteries to be the "Last of the Mohican' in own backyards.
Luke 9.55-56
Getting kick on the butts as casualty of the dead Mummy in not worshiping God.
Luke 6.39-40,41-45,46-49
What do you think?
2007-10-31 21:57:24
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because Iran sponsors terrorist organizations like Hezbollah, Hamas, the insurgents fighting us in Iraq, and has called for the destruction of both the US and Israel. The Iranians would most likely sell a nuclear device or radioactive material to one of those terrorist organizations to use against us or Israel. So they pose a much bigger threat than the isolationist North Koreans. Pakistan would be a threat if their pro U.S. government gets overthrown by radical muslims.
2007-10-31 20:13:46
·
answer #11
·
answered by Adolf Schmichael 5
·
2⤊
4⤋