Did human evolve from fish ?

Question

hmmmn !

Answer 1

no, apes

Answer 2

Evolve Fish

Answer 3

technically, in the path of evolution, the fish came, climbed up to land, became amphibians and evolved into reptiles upward. So far so straight.
Did mammals come from earlier versions of amphibians? I should think so. Nothing else lived on land except plants and insects before Nemo and his kin lumbered up, right? And some similarities in morphology still remain-we've got the aspects that makes us vertebrates same as they do.
It's quite a surprising thought, but once you think it through, it might have been. Truly. I don't want to eat milkfish or salmon for dinner while contemplating our degrees of relation, but it's very interesting to know.
As regards to that, there's another way we could say yes to our question- if, I guess, we're Buddhists, or pantheists, or believers of the religion that holds that we are all differing manifestations of the Great Spirit. That tuna sandwich could have been your best friend in the next life, or Bill Gates. That's a different context altogether rom evolutionary proposition, but hey. Who knows.

Answer 4

This Site Might Help You.

RE:
Did human evolve from fish ?
hmmmn !

Answer 5

For the best answers, search on this site https://shorturl.im/hFB4S

All land *vertebrates* evolved from a branch of fish known as the lobe-finned fish. Crabs are not vertebrates, they are arthropods. The land arthropods (the insects, spiders, scorpions, etc.) went through a completely different path in their journey from sea to land ... and did so long before the vertebrates. >"And what is the oldest recorded mammal and did it morph from an amphibian?" From amphibians to synapsid reptiles to therapsids to mammals. It's a bit hard to draw the line between where the therapsids ended and the "first mammals." The cynodonts were a sub-branch of the therapsids and are generally considered the ancestors to all modern mammals. >"And that would then mean that birds evolved from fish too before they were dinosaurs." No. Fish to amphibians to reptiles to dinosaurs to birds.

Answer 6

It started out as a single cell in the sea after the big bang and the formation of the earth. Somewhere somehow this single cell creature evolved to a fish and later this fish developed legs and crawled onto the land and later became a primate (monkey) and climbed on the tree.

Finally after millions of years spent on the trees, this primate came down from the tree and started to walk on two feet (bipedal).And so it goes...

Answer 7

500 million years ago the first fish species evolved on Earth.

Two million years ago the first humanoid species evolved on Earth.

Four BILLION years ago the first prokaryotes evolved on Earth.

In a really long, convoluted way, yes, humans did evolve from fish. Over a process of a few hundred million years. Just like we evolved from single cell organisms over a process of a few billion years.

Do we understand evolution enough now to move questions about it to the Biology section?

Answer 8

Yes, among other things. This depends on how far back on the evolutionary path one wishes to go. You might say Humans evolved from microbes, bacteria or any other form of simple life too.

Answer 9

About 500M years ago, yes- but so did every other creature on dry land. Nearly all land animals trace their root ancestry back to an ocean fish species called Eusthenopteron, which was the first fish to develop dual gills/lungs and spend part of its life on land. This gave birth to the first land reptiles and amphibians, and so on.

So, yeah, us, the crocodiles and giraffe all share a common ancestor.

Answer 10

No, we didn't evolve from fish, we share a common ancestor.

I just hoped that people reading that would realize how stupid it was to say we didn't evolve from apes but share a common ancestor.

We do have fish in our ancestry. We also share ancestors with a rudebaga and bacteria.

Answer 11

No. Scientists have attempted to prove we came from apes. They have yet to prove this. Even Darwin doubted his own theory. And not much has changed since Darwin except the attempt by atheists evolutionists who constantly and consistently try to prove the false claims of transitional fossils. Go back 20 years and you'll see false information on evolution in your science books. Many transitional fossils labeled by evolutionists have been proven false.