2007-10-31 17:08:18 · 17 answers · asked by ELON 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Ron Jeremy
2007-11-01 04:25:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Hillary is too wishy-washy
Obama is too young, something I rarely say. I should use the word immature instead. When the tornadoes ripped through kansas, not 4 people died, but according to him, 400 did. He needs to get his facts straight.
McCain....
Juliani...just weird.
2007-10-31 17:29:30 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mccain, possibly Obama.
2007-10-31 19:07:46 · answer #3 · answered by scorch_22 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Normally I'm on the side of the democrats, but this time, I'll be probably be supporting McCain. He's a very a intelligent and knowledgeable person.
2007-10-31 17:17:31 · answer #4 · answered by Ben 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Only one out of three is consistently against the war and against preemptive future wars although he stated once that he would go after terrorists in pakistan even without the pakistani's blessing.
So none of the above. They are all warmongers and will take your hard earned money and waste it on the current war and future wars. If you want to stop the insanity, vote with your conscience not with your fear.
Turn off the TV. Question the media.
Godspeed Ron Paul!
2007-10-31 17:20:47 · answer #5 · answered by 6th Finger 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Romney, Thompson, or Huckabee...I wont vote for Hillary McCain, or Guliani under any circumstance...Guliani will only make more sancuary cities for illegals.
2007-10-31 17:12:00 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Romney
2007-10-31 17:53:09 · answer #7 · answered by Avatar_defender_of_the_light 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Guiliani
2007-10-31 17:12:16 · answer #8 · answered by Calvin T 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Giuliani
2007-10-31 17:12:00 · answer #9 · answered by scarlettt_ohara 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Hard to say, but definitely not hillary-dickory-dock. That means giving things to the illegals and terrorists.
2007-10-31 17:26:47 · answer #10 · answered by Nothingusefullearnedinschool 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋