Tell me whether or not you are planning to vote for this person if you are anti-war in Iraq and anti-war in Iran?
2007-10-31 17:00:47 · 8 answers · asked by 6th Finger 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Tie: Dennis Kucinich/Ron Paul/That Bats### crazy guy Gavel.
2007-10-31 17:07:54 · answer #1 · answered by A Balrog of Morgoth 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
John Edwards shows lack of leadership and experiences by saying last night in the so-called debate, he would bring all the troops home in his first year of presidency. Does he really know the Al Qaeda plan in Iraq? That is a crap!
Orack Obama is using his absent in the most important issue that America is facing today as a strategy to make people understand that he's different. He was not a US Senator in 2002: the vote for the Iraq war. But he was campaigning when the crucial Iran vote took place in the senate. Vote to put economics sanctions on Iran to prevent them to create nuclear weapons. We still do not know his true actions ... because he always absent!
Hillary Clinton is playing smart. About the war in Iraq there's a logic we could not afford to ignore: "two wrongs don't make a right". This war in Iraq was a mistake we all know that, but it's not safe to bring all troops home, because we don't really know what would be the Al qaeda's plan in the near future.
And also it's obvious that actually no one, who's not a fool, could encourage America to attack Iran. But we don't know what would happen in 2, 4 years or more. If Iran is still determine to have nuclear weapon even after the economics sanctions, there would be no choice.
Hillary Clinton has its up and its down. She's not very clear with some questions and that's the bad side of politician people.
Who's clear or right on these policies:
1) Iraq war and Iran controversy?
2) Health Care Issue?
3) Economy and Environment?
4) National Security and Immigration?
No one!
Someone who support a candidate might say X or Y, but the reality appears otherwise. It's not sure to say who is better without a partisan mind. But in the democratic candidate field, Hillary shows she's more experienced and more prepared to lead America in its crucial time ...
Why? Because she prefers to avoid some "though questions" instead making "foolish comments"!
2007-11-01 00:52:41 · answer #2 · answered by Van Basten 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Dennis Kucinich and Ron Paul are probably the most vehement against the war, as is Gravel - but he is a kook. Bill Richardson is the only credible candidate that advocates getting all the troops out within a year. As a general rule of thumb, voting democrat will be a repudiation of the Iraq War and Bush's foriegn policy. I'm going to vote for either Richardson or Obama in the primary, and democrat in the general, unless it's Hillary Clinton. If she's the nominee, I'll vote 3rd party.
2007-11-01 00:15:48 · answer #3 · answered by redguard572001 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Well Ron Paul and Kusinich obviously. However as much as I dislike the war in Iraq I think we need to leave resposibly. To pick up and leave without regards to the responsibility we have to help the Iraqis rebuild a country we destroyed and ignore Al Queada in Iraq, that's what Paul and Kusinich want, I think that would be a big mistake. I don't really know how Edwards, Clinton, and Obama's plans really differ, they sound almost the same, but all seem to believe in a more measure responsible withdrawl.
2007-11-01 01:15:58 · answer #4 · answered by Chris256_98 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋
I think it's safe to say that noone wants to be in war,especially 3 of them at one time.Just don't let this one point be your deciding vote.Look in the long term,think about who you think might better us as a country.Think about immigration views,oil views,foreign trade,and of course war.I believe it's a sure bet whoever gets elected will have to start a withdrawl of troops,so that one is kind of a no brainer if they don't want to be impeached and if they want to be re elected.Immigration views should be the first thing,because it is ruining this country.
2007-11-01 00:21:20 · answer #5 · answered by cog1233 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
War is only making problems worse, both in the short and long run. Violence will never end in the Iraq, as long as we are seen as occupiers. If another nation invaded the US, would you ever stop resisting the occupation? I wouldn't. Iraqis understandably feel the same way about their country.
2007-11-01 00:12:36 · answer #6 · answered by pinchhazard 4 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Simple: the most Liberal, the one who hates America the most, is the one who opposes war in Iraq the most.
Vote for the anti-war movement, you are voting for war and terrorists from the Arab world.
2007-11-01 00:10:13 · answer #7 · answered by Nothingusefullearnedinschool 7 · 1⤊ 6⤋
Ron Paul; he's an isolationist.
2007-11-01 00:21:23 · answer #8 · answered by Caninelegion 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋