2007-10-31 15:33:58 · 24 answers · asked by realitycheck 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I view her as being severely socialist
She would need ethics for them to be challenged
2007-10-31 15:37:37 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 15⤊ 3⤋
No.
I view her as a vast ethical void. She is a Black Hole of duplicity, sucking in any possible ethical behavior before it has a chance to be seen, much less released. The universe prior to the Big Bang had more ethical content than the pathological liar that is Hillary Clinton. Hillary Clinton's ethics are so tiny, they could play Sea Hunt in your spit.
2007-10-31 23:39:11 · answer #2 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ethically challenged? Well, in the context of this question there is an assumption that she had ethics in the first place and I don't agree with that assumption. I believe she has no ethics at all. Anything goes with her (and her low life husband) - because it's all about the power. If you have the power then nothing else matters. That's it.
2007-10-31 15:47:19 · answer #3 · answered by Michael M 6 · 5⤊ 0⤋
How about this. Scooter Libby got the ax, a trial, and convicted for allegedly lying to Federal Prosecutors. The Special Prosecutor that investigated White Water, in his report to Congress stated "Hillery Clinton was less than truthful with Federal investigators" So where was the outrage from Congress that was heaped on Libby. It's in the Congressional Record. Dick Morris said she is fundamentally challenged when it comes to telling the truth. Even in the debates last night she denied saying what she had said one minute before.
2007-10-31 15:47:50 · answer #4 · answered by ohbrother 7 · 5⤊ 0⤋
i think she is damaged goods and corrupted. i can't question her ethics because my ethics arent the best either. i am no angel; but make no mistake, nor is she.....
however, i do know her publicly expressed opinions are based on what she thinks people want to hear. i also know she has an agendea seperate from what she sez. i don't like her and i don't trust her. in fact, instead of a vice prez, we would need a snake charmer if she was elected!
2007-10-31 15:42:40 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 1⤋
I see her as less ethically challenged than the two top Republicans, Bush and Cheney.
When it comes to other Republicans, I see her as less ethically challenged than some and no more ethically challenged than some of the others. Let's see: Giuliani - adulterer (personally, I thought it was interesting that Rudy's second wife, Donna Hanover, didn't like it when he cheated on her, but didn't seem to mind when he cheated on his first wife with her), McCain - adulterer (dumped first wife who stood by him when he was a POW to marry a very wealthy woman -- -- maybe you should read how the war hero treated the woman who was true to him http://www.boston.com/business/healthcare/articles/2007/10/29/medical_bill_errors_increasingly_common/), Gingrich - adulterer (dumped his wife when she was in the hospital receiving treatment for cancer). The news has been full of reports about other fine, upstanding Republicans caught with their ethics hanging out this past year.
2007-10-31 16:18:37 · answer #6 · answered by Nancy G 4 · 0⤊ 5⤋
Yes she is.
She is also a socialist with commie on the side.
And God help this country if she is elected.
So lets all keep her out of the White House. After all she did not finish robbing it from the last time.
2007-10-31 15:43:34 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 0⤋
It has been said (by a close, personal advisor of past, that all politicians lie. It's frightening how easy it comes to the Clintons.
2007-10-31 15:43:40 · answer #8 · answered by Doc 7 · 6⤊ 0⤋
Hillary is a career politician. Ethics is not in her vocabulary.
She is Satan.
2007-10-31 15:38:00 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 12⤊ 1⤋
There is no doubt in my mind that her politics are driven by expediency, rather than by core beliefs.
2007-10-31 17:34:13 · answer #10 · answered by Uncle Pennybags 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋