2007-10-31 15:21:39 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I'd say it's pretty likely. And I say it's an air strike...no ground troops (at first).
2007-10-31 15:33:31 · answer #1 · answered by Run Lola Run 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I hope they're good. Iran deserves a lot of Tomahawks, then boots on the ground after the radiation has dropped to acceptable levels.
2007-10-31 22:48:52 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
There are no troops to send. Iraq is draining the US military and there is no way that a "coalition of the willing" will send anyone this time around after getting punk`d on Iraq.
I`ll say about 50/50 on the bombing which would be a tragedy. More death and destruction for those poor bastards in the middle east. Too bad they were cursed with all that oil under their feet.
2007-10-31 22:59:06 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
With a wink and a nod, Israel will whack the nukes in Iran.
They did it in Iraq long before anyone even knew Saddam had a reactor.
They just did it without a hitch in Syria and Syria has a serious air force and anti aircraft defense system.
Iran can do nothing but just sit there and take it.
2007-10-31 22:28:42 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
The odds are very high that Bush will strike Iran before his term ends. He cannot get enough of blood shed and reckless spending of American money for death and destruction.
2007-10-31 23:39:54 · answer #5 · answered by yourmtgbanker 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
And just what boots would those be considering he's over stretched the Military to the breaking point
2007-10-31 22:50:42 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
boots... slim to none... he's not got a lot of time left... and doesn't have the boots to do it...
tomahawks... 50/50... but would that even do any good? who knows?
2007-10-31 22:26:47 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
This country is taking every appropriate action, we are currently sanctioning them, next will come the embargos, by then the Russian elections will be over and Putin will force them to comply
2007-10-31 22:26:30 · answer #8 · answered by rance42 5 · 0⤊ 3⤋
It needs to be done.
But with bombs.
Not missles. That was the cowardly way that clinton tried to fight terrorists and it failed.
Something along the lines of Hiroshima
2007-10-31 22:35:16 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
I woudn't put anything past those idiots in this administration.
2007-10-31 22:31:17 · answer #10 · answered by ash 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋