what are some things that u think should have made it into the harry potter movies?? one thing that comes to mind is the ghost history teacher and nearly headless nicks death day party...... that would have been cool..... plus the ghosts....... peeves and the bloody baron are only in the first movie for like 3 seconds...... whats up with that?? so what do u think??
2007-10-31 14:23:35 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
how about S.P.E.W....... and in the last movie they showed the beginning of harrys and chos relationship but not the downfall..... which is important......
2007-11-01 03:01:21 · update #1
ralfcode... i know EVERYTHING cant be in the movies but i was just wondering what some ppl would have liked to see...... i know binns would have been somewhat pointless as the death day party but it would have been cool to see........
2007-11-01 03:05:46 · update #2
Things I wish had made into the movies:
HP1: They kinda covered this one well - though it's the worst movie of the lot
HP2: Deathday party
HP3: Percy the HB(head boy or humongous bighead); Ron and Harry cooking up death omens for Trelawney's homework
HP4: Rita Skeeter's article abt Hagrid's giant blood, and the trio and Dumbledore talking him out of his isolation. Plus the blast-ended skrewts; Winky; SPEW
HP5: "Weasley is our King"; Ginny's growing role - she was given more footage from previous movies, but nothing compared to the books. "Give her hell from us, Peeves!"
2007-11-03 11:56:31 · answer #1 · answered by web_researcher 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There's so much I miss from the later films. The ghosts, mostly. I really think it was a mistake to not include Harry's conversation with Nearly Headless Nick in Order Of The Phoenix, when Nick explains that Sirius isn't coming back. And what happened to Sirius' mirror? Was that in the film? I don't remember it. That proves to be VERY important in Deathly Hallows.
Also, the omision of Dobby in Phoenix also may make his scene in Hallows less emotional.
This is why I think Potter should be made into a tv series, with each season covering one book. That way, you could cover everything, pretty much the way she wrote it. Granted, season one would be the shortest season, but so what?
2007-10-31 14:53:48 · answer #2 · answered by vtothef 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The baron and Peeves only contribute a very minor part to the story at the beginning. If the movies contained every single bit of story that JKR wrote, they'd be 10 times as long, would have cost half a billion dollars to make, and would have cost you $50 to get in to see it.
The realities of financial and time constraints meant that a lot of the material in the book had to get left out. JKR knew that, and she kept an eye on material that was going to be edited out of the movies as the screen plays were developed, so that the script writers didn't delete something that she knew would be needed later on. For example, a couple of scenes of Dobby and Kreecher were not going to be included in the latest movie, but she said, "Put them in". They were key bits of info that featured in later books.
2007-10-31 14:34:37 · answer #3 · answered by Ralfcoder 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
So many things, Harry and Cho's date, Quidditch in the latest movie, Peeves, Binns is sort of pointless admittedly, Dumbledore sucks, etc. etc. etc.
2007-10-31 14:33:06 · answer #4 · answered by Ar-Pharazon 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I missed Dobby and Winky in the fourth movie -- Goblet of Fire. Of course including them would have added a lot to the production cost.
2007-10-31 14:32:19 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋