Was 9/11 a conspiracy?

Question

no it wasnt

Answer 1

From what I have seen and heard I would say it was, if it was not why were our ships allready there when the towers were hit there was a lot more to it than we were every told in this case we were not the good guys our goverment will not tell us the truth because they what to save face.

Answer 2

Even though the World Trade Center was attacked in 1993 and was a know terrorist target, our government failed to protect it.

Our government failed to protect the Pentagon despite well over an hour of warning time and the availability of interceptors at Andrews AFB just 11 miles away.

9/11 was the largest security failure in the history of civil aviation, involving 4 successful hijackings with a total failure of hijacking countermeasures. Even the Air Force failed to intercept any of the 4 hijacked aircraft on 9/11. And with all these failures, no official involved in the response to the attacks received so much as a reprimand.

In addition, if 9/11 wasn't a conspiracy, then why haven't we captured Osama bin Laden yet? He's not even wanted by the FBI for the 9/11 attacks. Although he's wanted for a lot of other things. But 9/11's not one of them. You see, none of the FBIs 24 Most Wanted Terrorists are wanted for the attacks on 9/11. Confused? It gets better.

What about the plane that hit the Pentagon? The Pentagon is the command center for our national defense. Every square inch of the Pentagon has a video camera watching it. And there are surface to air missles on top of the Pentagon to stop a plane or missle from flying in to it. Where are all the pictures from all of the cameras? Why didn't those surface to air missles stop the plane before it hit?

And what about the steel melting jet fuel? Remember that jet fuel is primarily made of kerosene. And kerosene cannot melt steel. If it could, kerosene heaters would be melting all over the place. Hence, a kerosene fire could not have taken WTC Buildings 1, 2, and 7 completely down at free fall speed.

Before the towers fell people in the buildings said they heard and felt explosions coming from everywhere. And they didn't know where to run.

Would you believe that 5 or 6 years after 9/11 that body parts were found on the roofs of adjacent skyscrapers? What could have blown those body parts such a distance? Explosives?

Why was all the concrete in the towers pulverized? Fire doesn't do that? The fall wouldn't do that so thoroughly. But explosives would. Lots and lots of explosives.

Answer 3

No it was not a conspiracy of our own government.

For example:

1. THE FAILURE OF JETS TO SHOOT DOWN OUR OWN PLANES IS UNDERSTANDABLE

The main reason we didn’t shoot down the jets was because the hijackers had turned off the transponders, making it difficult to impossible to track the hijacked planes confidently. NORAD will only do what the controllers tell them, and the controllers couldn’t figure out what was going on until the second tower was hit. The controllers didn’t call NORAD until they spotted the jet almost at the Pentagon. By then, it was too late.

2. OSAMA NOT WANTED BY FBI BECAUSE HE’S A MILITARY TARGET

3 . STEEL DID NOT “MELT” IN THE TWIN TOWERS.

The towers mainly collapsed due to the large number of supports being knocked out by the jets.

The remaining supports had to hold up about 200,000 tons and were near the failure point. Meanwhile, the raging fire started weakening these remaining supports. (Steel loses half its strength at 600 deg C. At 1100 deg steel loses 90% of its strength, and that’s the temperature of a building fire)

Melting is not necessary nor did it occur.

The horizontal supports sagged downward & slowly pulled in the perimeter columns.

Many photographs of the towers show the exterior columns bending inward, a sign that the towers were doomed & also excellent proof that, without question, the jets alone caused the collapse.

The exterior columns then snapped inward & collapse ensued.

4. THERE IS CLEAR EVIDENCE THAT EXPLOSIONS DID NOT OCCUR:

1) Reports of explosions being heard are exaggerated.

Quote: “NIST reviewed all of the interviews conducted by the FDNY of firefighters (500 interviews) and in addition conducted its own set of interviews with emergency responders and building occupants. Taken as a whole, the interviews did not support the contention that explosives played a role in the collapse of the WTC Towers.”

From Section F of http://www.911proof.com/NIST.pdf

2) Puffs of air have no significance.

Puffs of air are seen all the time in demolitions and therefore they mean nothing.

Structural Engineer Jon Magnussen says it is fairly common phenomenon in building collapses. “You could actually have a collapse starting at the top of the building, and the air could come out of the bottom, going down the elevator shafts. It finds the path of least resistance.” (Pop Mechanics, “Debunking” p.45)

3) There was no seismic evidence of explosions before the collapse

Columbia University has permanent seismographic recorders that were running on 9/11 which clearly show no explosives preceding the collapse of Towers 1 & 2, or of WTC7 . See page 2 of
http://www.implosionworld.com/Article-WTC%20STUDY%208-06%20w%20clarif%20as%20of%209-8-06%20.pdf

4) Engineers have proved that the collapse resulted from the impact & the fire. Therefore, there is zero need to invoke bombs. See NIST’s explanation at
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/wtc/
(Click on “Impact to collapse” )

5. CONCTETE WAS NOT PULVERIZED

Whenever a building or stadium collapses, you get a large dust cloud, no matter what the cause. So the question becomes, was the dust cloud too big (suggesting that bombs went off) when WTC1&2 collapsed? Only an expert can tell you whether the dust cloud was more consistent with bombs than with collapse alone.

Fortunately, we have experts who have analyzed the collapse. Moreover, they published their findings for all to see in an article in the leading demolition journal, ImplosionWorld. They say the collapse did not look like a “controlled demolition.” See Point #1 in:

http://www.implosionworld.com/Article-WTC%20STUDY%208-06%20w%20clarif%20as%20of%209-8-06%20.pdf

Answer 4

Of course. The towers were about to fall so the government decided to steal 4 planes. The people on board all signed the paperwork giving their own government permission to vaporize them. The only conspiracy here is people not being smart enough to realize that our own government isn't smart enough to realize a cave rat still can't believe just how easy it was.

Answer 5

it couldn't be,the government couldn't plot such a thing.bush can't even tie his own shoes,none the less make up such a maneuvering plan,are government isn't capable of doing something people who have never had an education do,fyi,are government is not that bright.but you never know whats going on under that white house.

Answer 6

Yes, it was a conspiracy of mostly Saudi political and relgious fanatics.

Answer 7

Sure it was - Plotted for years by OBL & his band of loyal loons then carried out by foolish young men who were brainwashed into thinking that extra virgins would be waiting for them in paradise since they were willing to die for 'the cause'.....

Answer 8

someone had to conspire to make it happen you illiterate imbecile! and dude you answered your own question

Answer 9

Well it wasn't, was it?