Which person is more honest?

Question

Irans President Ahmadinejad when he made the statement that he intended to whip Israel off the map and then go after the big satan?(the US)......or Hillary when she promises the world to everyone pandering for votes??

tyler m...thats an easy one...Bush

A Cynic...theres a link for you...http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahmoud_Ahmadinejad

Answer 1

Certainly the midget in Iran. Hillary, if even electable, would only be able to implement so much of her socialist agenda before the American people would b up in arms.

Whereas the midget has a lot of support in his hatred for Israel inside and out of his country.

Answer 2

That's an easy one-- Iran's Pres!

For all her legal knowledge she's obviously forgotten what she learned in US Gov 101. 99% of the things she's promising are not within the power of the President to actually accomplish.

With an 11% approval rating I can only hope if Hillary (or any other Democrat) wins, Republicans get at least one house in Congress back.

Look back at the times when one party controlled both the White House and Congress. LBJ, Carter, Clinton's first two years, Bush's first six years. These have not been particualry good times for the USofA.

Answer 3

Irans president is more honest. I believe he actually believes what he says, and does intend to do what he says. Even if he cannot , at this time, back up the statements.
Hillary on the other hand is saying and doing whatever she has to to get votes. She most likely does not intend to follow through with most of what she promises, or will even remember saying it.

Answer 4

Ahmadinejad

Answer 5

Ahmadinejad is definitely more honest because he's an insane megalomaniacal tyrant. I believe without a doubt that he means what he says.

He also meant what he said when he said that there are no gays in Iran, because we know that he has killed them all.

Hillary is just a typical run-of-the-mill lying politician.

Answer 6

Hillary is. She changes her story according to how the wind is blowing. Ahmadinejad, on the other hand, never actually said that.

---------------------------------------------

And here's a link for you:

Just How Far Did They Go, Those Words Against Israel?
By ETHAN BRONNER
Published: June 11, 2006

EVER since he spoke at an anti-Zionism conference in Tehran last October, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran has been known for one statement above all. As translated by news agencies at the time, it was that Israel "should be wiped off the map." Iran's nuclear program and sponsorship of militant Muslim groups are rarely mentioned without reference to the infamous map remark.

Here, for example, is R. Nicholas Burns, the under secretary of state for political affairs, recently: "Given the radical nature of Iran under Ahmadinejad and its stated wish to wipe Israel off the map of the world, it is entirely unconvincing that we could or should live with a nuclear Iran."

But is that what Mr. Ahmadinejad said? And if so, was it a threat of war? For months, a debate among Iran specialists over both questions has been intensifying. It starts as a dispute over translating Persian but quickly turns on whether the United States (with help from Israel) is doing to Iran what some believe it did to Iraq — building a case for military action predicated on a faulty premise.

"Ahmadinejad did not say he was going to wipe Israel off the map because no such idiom exists in Persian," remarked Juan Cole, a Middle East specialist at the University of Michigan and critic of American policy who has argued that the Iranian president was misquoted. "He did say he hoped its regime, i.e., a Jewish-Zionist state occupying Jerusalem, would collapse." Since Iran has not "attacked another country aggressively for over a century," he said in an e-mail exchange, "I smell the whiff of war propaganda."

Jonathan Steele, a columnist for the left-leaning Guardian newspaper in London, recently laid out the case this way: "The Iranian president was quoting an ancient statement by Iran's first Islamist leader, the late Ayatollah Khomeini, that 'this regime occupying Jerusalem must vanish from the page of time,' just as the Shah's regime in Iran had vanished. He was not making a military threat. He was calling for an end to the occupation of Jerusalem at some point in the future. The 'page of time' phrase suggests he did not expect it to happen soon."

Answer 7

Ahmadinejad is not against Jews rather he is against Zionists. There is a big difference between Zionism and Judaism. The Jews in Iran enjoy freedom to worship and relative calm versus other Jews around the world. Zionism is a political movement that illegaly occupies peoples lands and oppress them using the Judaism religion as a cover and pretext.

Answer 8

The world operates 24/7 on lies. The higher up the food chain the bigger the lies. Neither of these political figures (politicians) has any concept of the principle "honesty".

Make it a great day!

Answer 9

Neither is honest . The difference is one is a dictator, the other is a politician in a democracy. One panders the other takes a more direct approach.

Answer 10

Ahjustshitmypants may be a bastard but I believe him and take him at his word! Hitler-y on the other hand is a 2 faced liar and that is her redeeming quality!