English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I know, I know, this is not something that has anything to do with political ideology, or part. And it is unfair to pick on republicans in any way based on the actions of one person. But it is too funny that this keeps happening to Republicans.

http://www.king5.com/localnews/stories/NW_103107WAB_curtis_resignation_LJ.1c5c1238f.html

It is even funny that he was going to spend $1000 for sex. Isn't that typical of Republicans? Gross overspending?

2007-10-31 10:22:27 · 21 answers · asked by Take it from Toby 7 in Politics & Government Politics

rightwing65: Are you implying that whenever a Republican has sex, they run the risk of "getting caught", meaning it is probably illegal or taboo?

2007-10-31 10:31:06 · update #1

Totally didn't realize the 70's porno 'stache. lol. Good one.

2007-10-31 10:31:47 · update #2

ret_roch_cop: You are lying. And Studds was centured at the same time as a republican.

2007-10-31 11:27:54 · update #3

21 answers

Geez, not again.

I bet he will use the "Larry Craig" defense as well.

Did you see that 70's porno mustache he is sporting in the pic?

2007-10-31 10:27:29 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5 3

It doesn't only happen with the republicans but since they are the ones who are so homophobic and intolerant, when they get caught with their pants down, the hypocrisy is overwhelming.

Why can't they just come out of the closet and admit that they like to swing both ways. It as nauseating as Clinton saying "I did not have sex with that lady" while playing with a cigar.

2007-10-31 17:30:03 · answer #2 · answered by chelseablue 3 · 8 1

That's only because that is about all they over spend on. Typically they don't have the charisma of John Kennedy, Gary Hart, Barney Franks (just had to throw that one in), and Bill Clinton to get it for free. But Bill did like them pudgey!*LOL*

2007-10-31 17:32:35 · answer #3 · answered by namsaev 6 · 4 1

LOL. This just makes me laugh. I haven't one care about whether someone is gay or not. It's the Republican hypocracy which gets me. "Gays are bad, except the Republican ones who hide it and fool their families."

EDIT to Mark A: Funny, but I don't see a Fox Noise "Out and About" Feature on their channel. Why not? If there's so many Dem gayboys out there submitting to blackmail and getting arrested in public bathrooms? WHERE ARE THEY?

EDIT to a bush family member: Oh yeah, I can remember Charlie Sheen's election to office like it was yesterday and him campaigning on the "I Won't Spend Money on Hookers" platform. How obtuse are you?

2007-10-31 17:32:57 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 5 2

They are nuts aren't they? I certainly never saw this self destruction coming. How the mighty have fallen. The bigger question may be, "Can the Republicans ever recover from the collapse we are seeing now?"

2007-10-31 17:32:58 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

Because they’re a bunch of hypocrites—homophobic, sexually repressed liars who run on values platforms since they can’t face their own weaknesses honestly or anyone else’s.

2007-10-31 17:43:55 · answer #6 · answered by relevant inquiry 6 · 2 0

Once again we have a man representing a political party who doesn't fulfill the code of conduct. People are going to make bad choices in their lives, but to claim an entire political party is guilty of it is like persecuting all christians for Westboro's wrong doings.

Slapping labels on people has become a major problem in this country.

2007-10-31 17:28:46 · answer #7 · answered by dovesong44 2 · 3 5

It's looking more and more like republican politicians are majorly STUPID. Not only do they condem what they themselves do, they get caught at it!

2007-10-31 17:35:09 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

The Republican always pays the price. Democrats, on the other hand, rally around their perverts and make them the latest cause celebre. Remember when Gerry Studds was porking an underaged congressional page? The Democrats lowered the age of consent.

2007-10-31 17:38:54 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 7

There is no real conservatives running in that party, what a shame.

2007-10-31 17:34:52 · answer #10 · answered by BrushPicks 5 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers