Yes! Thank goodness we will be welcoming another Republican into the White House! ( And I dont mean the Isolationist Geiser Ron Paul! I mean Really! What are the people who support this loon thinking?!)
Fred Thompson has my vote!!!!!!!!!!!
2007-10-31 09:43:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by HLBellevino 5
·
2⤊
2⤋
Well, let me preface my comments by saying I am neither a Dem or a Rep. I think you are considering half of the equation. The fact is that Hillary is just one component; it depends, too, on who and how the Republicans choose as their candidate for President.
It's not reported much, but there are serious and very real divisions within the Republican Party. It in part explains not only so many candidates, but so many viable candidates. Social and neo-conservatives largely the GOP's officers. Religious right and moderate Republicans feel marginalized. If it gets ugly, many Republicans may jump ship in the general election or, more likely, just not vote.
A year ago, I would have thought Clinton's chances were slim. Now I think she's a got a better shot than anyone else, Republican or Democrat.
Cheers.
2007-10-31 16:47:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by blueevent47 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
If Hillary wins the nomination you can almost guarantee a Republican President next term. She cannot win in a general election, Republicans will NOT vote for her under any circumstance. Also Giuliani (who most likely will be the Republican candidate) has some liberal views such as Pro-Choice and Gay Rights which will sway some Dems who are on the fence about Hillary. I feel that our only hope as a country is an Obama / Edwards ticket. I think this is the team that can give a one/two punch to whoever the Republicans serve up.
Obama / Edwards '08
2007-10-31 17:45:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Only if Dick Cheney is doing the shooting! ;)
Seriously, though, if everyone did as you seem hellbent on doing (i.e., voting for someone you don't even think will win), then that person might very well win!
But, if you and everyone else votes for the best QUALIFIED person, then race, age, sex, religion, political viewpoint, etc, shouldn't matter. It's a shame that people have to resort to selecting the person who most closely resembles them, physically, rather than voting for an intelligent statesman who has been in the political arena for a while; and heaven help those who vote based on their limited intellectual capacities! (on second thought, heaven help the rest of us!!!). ;)
For the confused among us, there is a nifty webpage that gives folks a way to select a candidate from a series of questions based on your personal viewpoints, rather than on the candidates' viewpoints! The link, below, is from Minnesota Public Radio (note to rabid, ultra-right-wing, conservative, Republicans: yes, it's "PBS", and, no, the poll does not have liberal leftist leanings, but you are free to believe otherwise! (what would it hurt to take the poll; wouldn't it amaze you if your "best" candidate was in the "other" party?!)) FYI, it will take a few minutes to read the questions, but it's worth the time and effort; on the other hand, it could end up like past elections, if you just skim the surface and choose *that* way! =shudder= ;)
P.S. Don't tell people how to respond to your questions. If you don't like the answers, then don't vote for them! (hey, that's just like a "real" election, isn't it? what great practice you're getting!) ;)
P.P.S. The word is "whether", not "weather".
2007-10-31 18:05:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by skaizun 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
The most qualified candidate is the 4 time Nobel Peace Prize nominee Governor Richardson. He had the experience of Junior Congresspeople Hillary, Edwards, and Barack a long time ago with 15 years in the Congress and he is younger than Hillary. He's been the US Secretary of Energy, Ambassador to the US formed United Nations, and is now a popular Governor. Experience should be a major factor in deciding such a crucial position as US President.
2007-10-31 16:56:40
·
answer #5
·
answered by Mike 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
I hope so.
Deval Patrick won in Massachusetts. He is doing a great job. I am so pleased. He is working hard and very committed to the people here. He has had some missteps to be sure but he's trying. He's staying connected to the people. You can try to call in and speak with him on a radio talk show here once a month. Romney never did anything like that. In fact, Deval has done a lot to be closer to the people. I think that speaks volumes.
I think the democrats have a big shot at victory. But the ones in Congress could be messing it up because they lack a backbone to fight Bush head on. They are to a degree but they need to kick it up.
That's why we have the 3 branches. Accountability. Isn't it? That might not be the right word. oversight.
2007-10-31 16:50:06
·
answer #6
·
answered by Unsub29 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Its sad that people think a woman or a black man can't get elected president in america. Other nations have already had female prime ministers and presidents, its time america get out of 18th century thinking.
If we have a republican in the white house (very unlikely) it will be a disaster for America, but one we deserve. I may sound like a nut case for saying this, but if Bush sparks World War III with Russia over his obsession with Iran's nonexistent nuclear weapons program, voting won't matter because we will all be dead or radioactive.
2007-10-31 17:13:14
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well, there's two sides to every coin. Before you say people wouldn't vote for her because she's a woman, or people wouldn't vote for Obama because he's black, people are also shallow enough to vote for Hillary on the sole fact that she is a woman, and vote for Obama on the sole fact that he's black. I'm not voting for either because I don't agree with them.
Moving on...
It's still too soon to tell, which is strange. I think it's up for grabs, and there's still plenty that could happen within the next year, let alone before the primary. There are plenty of people pissed at both parties, which I think is a good thing. People are finally becoming more critical of government. It's very up in the air.
2007-10-31 16:47:33
·
answer #8
·
answered by Hellion 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
I am a registered member of the Republican party and have been since I gained citizenship almost fifty years ago. As in my native Cuba I was never allowed to vote, I take full advantage of the right and vote in every single election I get the chance. I make it a priority.
However, this election I will not be voting Republican, and I did not vote Republican in the last election.
The Bush administration and the Iraq war is far too unpopular for there to be another Republican in office after him, there's just no way.
A Democrat will be sitting in the oval office after Bush packs up his things, I promise you that.
2007-10-31 16:44:52
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
1⤋
Bite your tongue! You are right that prejudice still exists, and it will be harder for a woman or a Black man to be elected. Many Republicans say Obama isn't "Black" enough to represent African Americans, so I guess they're giving Obama their seal of approval.
Either way, I think America has had enough of secretive and incompetent leadership (or lack thereof) in the White House, and has enough sense to know that if almost any of the Republican candidates are elected, certainly the leading candidates, we would just get more of the same.
2007-10-31 17:10:32
·
answer #10
·
answered by Don P 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think the Dems can win, but with Clinton it is becoming a question of electability. In recent polls she gets 46-49% but there are just as many that say they will not vote for her. She is an easy target and b/c of that I think Rudy would probably beat her with his "I was Mayor during 9/11, so that qualifies me for prez campaign"
2007-10-31 17:01:56
·
answer #11
·
answered by Josh B 3
·
1⤊
1⤋