Your opinion on Gun Laws in the UK?

Question

If a law was put forward tomorrow allowing any law-abiding UK citizen to own a firearm for self-defense, what would be your opinion and action on this?

Answer 1

I wouldn't support it. If you are all disarmed. it will be a lot easier for us to annex you. Or maybe the Germans would like another crack at it.
No man ever successfully defended his home, family, or property from armed aggressors with words.
But that's why I love the Brits, they are cute in their naivete.

Answer 2

I'd say it would be completely 100% utterly wrong and stupid in the extreme. The absolute worst nightmare for law enforcers are people 'taking the law into their own hands' - if you shoot someone, even in "self defense" it is taking the law into your own hands and passing judgement on someone wrongly (i.e. without a legal framework) Just about the only country that allows it's citizens to carry guns has the highest gun crime in the West - the US. Any country which has stricter gun laws has less gun crime. Even Canada has less gun crime, and it's still relatively easy to get a gun there (compared to Europe)

However, it would probably be a good idea to at least increase the number of armed police officers - even with non-lethal weapons; if not to arm them all.

Answer 3

The previous drained rhetoric that pertinent gun guidelines are already in position and that's an enforcement problem would not ring really genuine. i imagine there should be more advantageous controls on possessing a gun. everyone is genuinely entitled to personal a gun for self safe practices, yet for the intentional killing of residing issues, which includes recreation, to my thoughts is conceited and vicious inasmuch as we placed on species blinders. that's no clinical or organic and organic secret that a deer, as an party, feels discomfort. Why would each and every human being reason discomfort in yet another residing aspect, for the "thrilling" of it? i understand this isn't a universal perspective, yet I really do not have to any extent further began to hearken to a good clarification why killing for recreation is morally merely. i understand some distant relations in Alabama that really do hunt deer for the venison, so i assume that's a valid justification. yet really, it is the exception, no longer the rule of thumb. If those styles of firearms would nicely be prohibited, it would a minimum of placed a small dent contained in the proliferation of deadly guns for sale. As for possessing a handgun for safe practices or self-protection, the statistic irony is that those in-living house guns regularly finally end up getting used to settle a relations dispute. there is not any good answer to this question. If some human beings were allowed to carry a hid weaon at Virginia Tech, the shooter would not were as useful as he changed into. The question then turns into, who's entitled to carry a hid weapon. My superb answer is that there will be a range of human being who's qualified to stroll round armed. merely no longer everyone.

Answer 4

dont visit the UK

or Florida or Texas if you dont wanna get shot!