The media isn't liberal or conservative - its pro-government.
They need politicians who will spend money on war, phony-environmentalism, insurance, medical supplies, and weapons. Do you think they ask which party the politician is from? NO! They ask how much tax-payer money the politician is willing to spend.
Here, I spent some hours last night following campaign contributions from "America's News Leader," the #1 recipient of corporate welfare and federal contracts. The "Public Responsibility" executive puts his money on people like Harry Reid, Tom Daschle, Patrick Leahy, and... (drumroll) George Bush.
The media supports ALL the front-runners and "Senate leaders" because they're the ones who control the tax flow.
Party politics is the greatest illusion of modern government.
http://www.undergroundpolitics.com/index.php/markets_and_economy/nbc_msnbc_and_ge_campaign_financing.html
2007-10-31 07:23:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by freedom first 5
·
8⤊
2⤋
What in the blazes are you talking about? Rupert Murdoch supporting Hillary? When has fox ever supported Hillary? Their coverage of the Democratic debate showed that's not the case.
Cite a show on Fox News or *something* that supports your claim.
2007-10-31 14:58:14
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's the sly FOX network that gets me laughing. Bringing in major ratings and bucks using controversies and games. And all the while the population bleeds dirty con's ! Faux News is correct. Reality TV staged for your convenience. Just look at the conglomerate that Murdoch owns. Books... satellite TV in China (Mrs. #3 is Chinese)... papers all over the world?! You bet there are dealings being made. As the Liberal agenda continues to bash President Bush. Over 25 mentions by HRC last night in the debate about Bush. The man is not running? But his party is. The worst divide and conquer. Communism 101. And watch the limits in Talk Radio and her work with the FCC and monitoring the Internet.Each proposals already on the floor. Censorship is next. Freedom of Speech squelched. What then? A Dictatorship? Thanks for asking.
edit: above CognV absolutely ! And federal lobbyist campaign contributions only one candidate accepts...
2007-10-31 14:31:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by Mele Kai 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
The media truly is for big government! Call it what you want but regardless the truth is the media will always be on the "caring" side of the people which leads to massive support for many programs from republican or democrat. Liberty and freedom will soon be gone and only afterwards will the people stand up and fight..........by then it's too late!
2007-11-01 03:28:50
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Murdoch can see Bush is on his way out so he has to support Clinton and anyway I'm sure she is enough of a fascist for him even though he would prefer someone more extreme the real question is who owns who? The answer is probably that they are both owned by the coorporations but then Murdoch is a coorporations so...
2007-10-31 14:27:13
·
answer #5
·
answered by airmonkey1001 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
The media has been controlled by the liberals for a very long time now. Way to keep up.
2007-10-31 19:08:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bush supports Hillary too... is the media less conservative?
2007-10-31 14:29:35
·
answer #7
·
answered by subprimelendor 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Have you been away for a long time or in a coma for the last 10 years. Peace
2007-10-31 14:26:19
·
answer #8
·
answered by PARVFAN 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
No, in case you haven't paid attention the media has been a LOT less conservative for many many years...You're just finally noticing.
2007-10-31 14:21:50
·
answer #9
·
answered by Erinyes 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
Most of the Media has always been LIBERAL.
2007-10-31 14:20:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by MY NAME MICHELLE I HATE AMERICA 5
·
2⤊
2⤋