2007-10-31 07:09:50 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
It should be. Noone should be confirmed for that position who isn't willing to uphold our nation's laws and hold criminals accountable for their misdeeds.
2007-10-31 07:13:26 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 1⤋
Yes, only some sadistic freak would support waterboarding.
Anyone who thinks that waterboarding isn't immoral, try it yourself. Grab a friend, get a rag, put it over your face, have your friend restrain you, and then have him/her pour water on your face. How long do you think you will be able to go without quitting?
2007-10-31 14:20:16 · answer #2 · answered by ck4829 7 · 5⤊ 0⤋
Every day I think I can't be horrified any more, something like this happens.
So waterboarding isn't torture? God, I'd hate to be the child of any of these S & M freaks.
2007-10-31 14:20:59 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 0⤋
Yes Waterboarding should be used on all Attorney's.
2007-10-31 14:13:35 · answer #4 · answered by MY NAME MICHELLE I HATE AMERICA 5 · 4⤊ 3⤋
I hope so. America should be a nation of great character, human rights and opportunity.
Bush/Cheney has made the US into a military - capitalist nation on speed.
2007-10-31 14:22:52 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
If waterboarding isn't torture I think we should have members of the white house staff and everyone who doesn't think it is for that matter volunteer for a little bit of waterboarding.
2007-10-31 14:15:55 · answer #6 · answered by Franklin 7 · 6⤊ 2⤋
I think we should waterboard all of the canidates, and the one who can take it the longest gets the Presidency. Even if my party loses, the individual proves that they are the stongest contender.
2007-10-31 14:17:23 · answer #7 · answered by mbush40 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Only pro torture candidates are proposed by Bush, so we may not have another Attorney General.
2007-10-31 14:16:21 · answer #8 · answered by Zardoz 7 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Maybe it should be. It is torture as defined by the Geneva Convention of which the US was a signing member.
2007-10-31 14:23:13 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
No, his written answers to the question will include the information that could not be answered publically. The Senator who asked the question knew that and took full advantage to back stab the man. He will be overwhelming selected and it will be based on his written testimony where we cannot see it. That overwhelming vote for his selection would be an excellent example of the low blows done by Congress.
2007-10-31 14:15:59 · answer #10 · answered by rance42 5 · 4⤊ 3⤋
Yes all candidates should get the waterboard treatment then they can decide whether it is tortutre or not.
2007-10-31 14:15:14 · answer #11 · answered by Global warming ain't cool 6 · 7⤊ 1⤋